In this paper I respond to the objections and comments made by Ranalli, Williams,and Moyal-Sharrock, participants in a symposium on my book on scepticism calledThe Illusion of Doubt
I’d like to thank my critics for their thoughtful and challenging commentary. I appreciate the time ...
In this paper I reply to the objections raised against my book in this symposium. I also get back on...
This is a revised version of a paper presented at the APA Eastern Division's 115th annual meeting in...
In this contribution I reply to commentators for the book symposium on my *Moore and Wittgenstein. S...
This paper is a reply to the comments by Henrike Moll, Glenda Satne, Ladislav Koreň and Michael Schm...
The paper attempts to respond to a number of objections that have been formulated in the book Ethi...
In a forthcoming review symposium in Metascience, Mauro Dorato, Elaine Landry and Stathis Psillos cr...
university of minnesota During the Winter of 2011 i visited SaDaf and gave a series of talks based o...
We have carefully read Rossello´s reaction to our paper, and we appreciate his taking the time to pr...
An objection that has been raised to the conciliatory stance on the epistemic significance of peer d...
I want to take this opportunity to thank the contributors to this symposium for their astute comment...
Part of book symposium on _Perception and Basic Beliefs_. Responses to Terry Horgan, Alvin Goldman, ...
Response to Don Baxter, Don Garrett and Jennifer Marusic regarding my book Imagined Causes: Hume's C...
In the replies to my critics that follow I offer a more detailed account of the specific papers that...
The paper contains the replies to the comments made by Alan Millar, Yuval Avnur, Giorgio Volpe, and ...
I’d like to thank my critics for their thoughtful and challenging commentary. I appreciate the time ...
In this paper I reply to the objections raised against my book in this symposium. I also get back on...
This is a revised version of a paper presented at the APA Eastern Division's 115th annual meeting in...
In this contribution I reply to commentators for the book symposium on my *Moore and Wittgenstein. S...
This paper is a reply to the comments by Henrike Moll, Glenda Satne, Ladislav Koreň and Michael Schm...
The paper attempts to respond to a number of objections that have been formulated in the book Ethi...
In a forthcoming review symposium in Metascience, Mauro Dorato, Elaine Landry and Stathis Psillos cr...
university of minnesota During the Winter of 2011 i visited SaDaf and gave a series of talks based o...
We have carefully read Rossello´s reaction to our paper, and we appreciate his taking the time to pr...
An objection that has been raised to the conciliatory stance on the epistemic significance of peer d...
I want to take this opportunity to thank the contributors to this symposium for their astute comment...
Part of book symposium on _Perception and Basic Beliefs_. Responses to Terry Horgan, Alvin Goldman, ...
Response to Don Baxter, Don Garrett and Jennifer Marusic regarding my book Imagined Causes: Hume's C...
In the replies to my critics that follow I offer a more detailed account of the specific papers that...
The paper contains the replies to the comments made by Alan Millar, Yuval Avnur, Giorgio Volpe, and ...
I’d like to thank my critics for their thoughtful and challenging commentary. I appreciate the time ...
In this paper I reply to the objections raised against my book in this symposium. I also get back on...
This is a revised version of a paper presented at the APA Eastern Division's 115th annual meeting in...
DOI
Add to ORKG