Add to ORKGIn his 2004 Horace E Read Memorial Lecture, David Mullan assesses the impact of the due process explosion. To what extent has the evolution of Canadian law (both statutory and common) in the domain of procedural fairness been responsible for the phenomenon of excessive judicialization of the administrative process? Has the increase in the number of decision-makers subject to the obligation of procedural fairness and the growth in the parallels between tribunal and court processes affected adversely the interests of the administrative justice system and the public that it is meant to serve? The author suggests that there is a basis for this concern. He also argues that one potentially profitable way of dealing with it is for tribunals to r...
This thesis examines the concept of “deference” in relation to judicial review of administrative dec...
The tribunal standing question arises when an administrative body whose decision is being subjecte...
The apparent variance between two corpora — Justice Gonthier’s administrative law judgments and his ...
In Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, the Supreme Court re-examined its approach to judicial review of admin...
For decades, the Supreme Court of Canada has contemplated the appropriate standard of judicial revie...
The standard of review analysis for judicial review of administrative action developed by the Suprem...
Although the Supreme Court of Canada’s seminal decision in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick has now been ci...
The substantive law of judicial review of administrative action has grown in leaps and bounds in rec...
As administrative law has grown so have the suggestions for change and reform. During the last thirt...
This article analyzes the first three years of the operation of Rule 2.1 of Ontario’s Rules of Civil...
Claimants who come to administrative tribunals in Canada, as elsewhere, expecting a convenient forum...
Mr. McLeod argues that the role of rules in judicial decision-making is commonly misunderstood by bo...
This paper examines the surprising resurgence of the Bill of Rights in procedural fairness cases bef...
The administration of ‘summary’ justice in the lower criminal courts in England and Wales is undergo...
Rarely does an Administrative Law decision raise the issue of the proper relationship between boards...
This thesis examines the concept of “deference” in relation to judicial review of administrative dec...
The tribunal standing question arises when an administrative body whose decision is being subjecte...
The apparent variance between two corpora — Justice Gonthier’s administrative law judgments and his ...
In Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, the Supreme Court re-examined its approach to judicial review of admin...
For decades, the Supreme Court of Canada has contemplated the appropriate standard of judicial revie...
The standard of review analysis for judicial review of administrative action developed by the Suprem...
Although the Supreme Court of Canada’s seminal decision in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick has now been ci...
The substantive law of judicial review of administrative action has grown in leaps and bounds in rec...
As administrative law has grown so have the suggestions for change and reform. During the last thirt...
This article analyzes the first three years of the operation of Rule 2.1 of Ontario’s Rules of Civil...
Claimants who come to administrative tribunals in Canada, as elsewhere, expecting a convenient forum...
Mr. McLeod argues that the role of rules in judicial decision-making is commonly misunderstood by bo...
This paper examines the surprising resurgence of the Bill of Rights in procedural fairness cases bef...
The administration of ‘summary’ justice in the lower criminal courts in England and Wales is undergo...
Rarely does an Administrative Law decision raise the issue of the proper relationship between boards...
This thesis examines the concept of “deference” in relation to judicial review of administrative dec...
The tribunal standing question arises when an administrative body whose decision is being subjecte...
The apparent variance between two corpora — Justice Gonthier’s administrative law judgments and his ...