Constitutional court verdict number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, dated February 17, 2012 from women leaders perspective

Based on interviews with officials ofMuslimatNU and Aisiyah Malang, regardingthe verdictof the Constitutional Court(MK)No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, on judicial review of Marriage Lawarticle 2 paragraph (2), and article 43 paragraph (1), that associated with registration of marriage, is accepted as obligation thatserves to maintain order and to obtain legal protection. However,under the hands marriage (siri)is not seen as an aberration. The position of children outside marriage in theverdictof the MK, is meant to the children fromunder the hands marriage. Childrenborn of adultery, was given protection and their rights. To prevent the proliferation of adultery that can be caused from thedecision of the Constitutional Court, Anti-AdulteryLaw must be mad