The author reviews the state of the investment regime, which is probably the strongest international regime in existence today. He identifies three main areas for improvement, relating to the regime’s objectives, substantive provisions and dispute-settlement mechanism. Changes will have to be driven by civil society
The exclusion of investor-state arbitration from the TTIP agreement would represent a regressive dev...
The bilateral investment court system the EU buttressed since 2015 risks losing momentum in the face...
The rule of law and dispute avoidance and settlement may not be enough to turn FDI into a means to t...
A multilateral framework on investment could provide an opportunity for a systematic review and refo...
While the current framework of international investment law is largely shaped to promote and protect...
There is a crisis in international investment law brought about by rapid changes in the economic ord...
Discussions on a multilateral investment framework have recently seen a revival, as the Internationa...
This Perspective, based partly on the author’s personal experiences with the Indian Model Bilateral ...
Despite extensive arbitral practice interpreting investment treaty protections, serious shortcomings...
Most countries strive to attract FDI, yet around one fourth of all FDI projects established in devel...
This Perspective argues that investment law is ripe for a paradigm shift away from pure capital prot...
Since the last century international investment law has been developing along with the increasing nu...
Today, international investment law consists of a network of multifaceted, multilayered internationa...
To level the playing-field in investment-state dispute-settlement, an advisory center on internation...
With growth in foreign investment and in the number of companies investing in foreign countries, the...
The exclusion of investor-state arbitration from the TTIP agreement would represent a regressive dev...
The bilateral investment court system the EU buttressed since 2015 risks losing momentum in the face...
The rule of law and dispute avoidance and settlement may not be enough to turn FDI into a means to t...
A multilateral framework on investment could provide an opportunity for a systematic review and refo...
While the current framework of international investment law is largely shaped to promote and protect...
There is a crisis in international investment law brought about by rapid changes in the economic ord...
Discussions on a multilateral investment framework have recently seen a revival, as the Internationa...
This Perspective, based partly on the author’s personal experiences with the Indian Model Bilateral ...
Despite extensive arbitral practice interpreting investment treaty protections, serious shortcomings...
Most countries strive to attract FDI, yet around one fourth of all FDI projects established in devel...
This Perspective argues that investment law is ripe for a paradigm shift away from pure capital prot...
Since the last century international investment law has been developing along with the increasing nu...
Today, international investment law consists of a network of multifaceted, multilayered internationa...
To level the playing-field in investment-state dispute-settlement, an advisory center on internation...
With growth in foreign investment and in the number of companies investing in foreign countries, the...
The exclusion of investor-state arbitration from the TTIP agreement would represent a regressive dev...
The bilateral investment court system the EU buttressed since 2015 risks losing momentum in the face...
The rule of law and dispute avoidance and settlement may not be enough to turn FDI into a means to t...
DOI
Add to ORKG