Author\u27s Note: On June 23, as this article was going to press, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 in U.S. v. Texas, thus affirming a preliminary injunction against implementation of the Obama Administration’s deferred-action program for millions of undocumented immigrants. Because the Court’s terse per curiam decision established no precedent, the questions that the case raised regarding the permissible scope of administrative enforcement discretion remain unresolved on the national level. The Supreme Court will likely consider them again—after a decision on a permanent injunction in the same case, in a similar immigration dispute, or perhaps in another field of administrative law. The issues explored by this article thus remain very much ...
Private party oversight has proven to be ineffective at countering inaction by the Food and Drug Adm...
In November 2014, President Obama announced a significant turn in U.S. immigration policy: that immi...
This Article describes one of the most striking features of the Trump Administration’s immigration p...
Author\u27s Note: On June 23, as this article was going to press, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 i...
With increasing frequency, courts are issuing nationwide injunctions barring the executive from enfo...
On June 23, 2016, the Supreme Court issued a 4-4 ruling in the immigration case of United States v. ...
President Obama’s ambitious use of executive discretion in immigration – especially the DACA and DAP...
I. UNITED STATES V. TEXAS: DEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF ENFORCEMENT DISCRETION A. DAPA AND THE CONSTIT...
This Article focuses attention on two recent and notable federal court opinions considering challeng...
United States immigration courts that decide asylum cases are situated within the Justice Department...
Given the federal courts’ reluctance to provide clarity on the degree to which the First Amendment s...
In this article, I place the Supreme Court case of United States v. Texas into a broader context by ...
On April 12, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) temporarily lifted its decades-long restri...
On April 12, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) temporarily lifted its decades-long restri...
Congressional amendments to the immigration code in the 1990s significantly broadened grounds for re...
Private party oversight has proven to be ineffective at countering inaction by the Food and Drug Adm...
In November 2014, President Obama announced a significant turn in U.S. immigration policy: that immi...
This Article describes one of the most striking features of the Trump Administration’s immigration p...
Author\u27s Note: On June 23, as this article was going to press, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 i...
With increasing frequency, courts are issuing nationwide injunctions barring the executive from enfo...
On June 23, 2016, the Supreme Court issued a 4-4 ruling in the immigration case of United States v. ...
President Obama’s ambitious use of executive discretion in immigration – especially the DACA and DAP...
I. UNITED STATES V. TEXAS: DEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF ENFORCEMENT DISCRETION A. DAPA AND THE CONSTIT...
This Article focuses attention on two recent and notable federal court opinions considering challeng...
United States immigration courts that decide asylum cases are situated within the Justice Department...
Given the federal courts’ reluctance to provide clarity on the degree to which the First Amendment s...
In this article, I place the Supreme Court case of United States v. Texas into a broader context by ...
On April 12, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) temporarily lifted its decades-long restri...
On April 12, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) temporarily lifted its decades-long restri...
Congressional amendments to the immigration code in the 1990s significantly broadened grounds for re...
Private party oversight has proven to be ineffective at countering inaction by the Food and Drug Adm...
In November 2014, President Obama announced a significant turn in U.S. immigration policy: that immi...
This Article describes one of the most striking features of the Trump Administration’s immigration p...