Preclusion is not a simple principle; it is a multifaceted concept affected by a number of relevant variables. A discussion of the principles is meaningful only if specific situations are discussed; to talk in generalities is not profitable. Therefore, for the sake of clarity, this Article will consider several typical situations
The defining question in modern habeas corpus law involves the finality of a state conviction: What ...
Preclusion rules prevent parties from revisiting matters that they have already litigated. A corolla...
That every judicial judgment, whatever its character, consists of premises and conclusion is a fact ...
Preclusion is not a simple principle; it is a multifaceted concept affected by a number of relevant ...
In criminal litigation, similar doctrines have been invoked. Double jeopardy has precluded a second ...
The courts and the authorities have reached something of a consensus on the matter of issue preclusi...
Res judicata law in the United States of America has a long, extensive and complex history. The aim ...
Most scholarly works on res judicata rest on two long–established assumptions: i) the scope for the ...
From historical, jurisprudential, and comparative perspectives, this Article tries to synthesize res...
The interrelation of lawsuits is one of the most troublesome, yet least commented upon, areas of the...
This Article treats the order of decision on multiple issues in a single case. That order can be ver...
This Article treats the order of decision on multiple issues in a single case. That order can be ver...
The Article proceeds from the premise, established in Part I, that federal courts must apply preclus...
The author discusses the effects of the res judicata rule as regards jurisdictional decisions of the...
During the 1999-2000 survey year the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has issue...
The defining question in modern habeas corpus law involves the finality of a state conviction: What ...
Preclusion rules prevent parties from revisiting matters that they have already litigated. A corolla...
That every judicial judgment, whatever its character, consists of premises and conclusion is a fact ...
Preclusion is not a simple principle; it is a multifaceted concept affected by a number of relevant ...
In criminal litigation, similar doctrines have been invoked. Double jeopardy has precluded a second ...
The courts and the authorities have reached something of a consensus on the matter of issue preclusi...
Res judicata law in the United States of America has a long, extensive and complex history. The aim ...
Most scholarly works on res judicata rest on two long–established assumptions: i) the scope for the ...
From historical, jurisprudential, and comparative perspectives, this Article tries to synthesize res...
The interrelation of lawsuits is one of the most troublesome, yet least commented upon, areas of the...
This Article treats the order of decision on multiple issues in a single case. That order can be ver...
This Article treats the order of decision on multiple issues in a single case. That order can be ver...
The Article proceeds from the premise, established in Part I, that federal courts must apply preclus...
The author discusses the effects of the res judicata rule as regards jurisdictional decisions of the...
During the 1999-2000 survey year the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has issue...
The defining question in modern habeas corpus law involves the finality of a state conviction: What ...
Preclusion rules prevent parties from revisiting matters that they have already litigated. A corolla...
That every judicial judgment, whatever its character, consists of premises and conclusion is a fact ...