Not AvailableThe paper deals with length-weight relationship of selected commercially important marine fishes from the east-coast of India. Samples were collected fortnightly from experimental fishing using trawl operated at depth up to 70 M off Vishakhapatnam coast on the east-coast of India during 2015-17. Measurements of total length and body weight of individual fish were taken. The LWR showed good fit with rraised to 2 values ranging from 0.975 for Lepturacanthus savala Cuvier, 1829 to 0.999 for Upeneus vittatus Forsskal, 1775. The ‘b’ values ranged from 2.618 for Photopectoralis bindus Valenciennes, 1835 to 3.186 for L. savala Cuvier, 1829.Not Availabl
Not AvailableLength–weight relationship (LWR) was estimated for 12 elasmobranch species; five ...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationship (LWR) was estimated for 12 elasmobranch species; five ...
Not AvailableLength‐weight relationships (LWR) for eight deep‐sea fishes belonging to six families ...
Not AvailableThe paper deals with length-weight relationship (LWR) of selected commercially importan...
Not AvailableThe paper deals with length-weight relationship (LWR) of selected commercially importan...
Not AvailableThe paper deals with length-weight relationship (LWR) of selected commercially importan...
Not AvailableThe paper deals with length-weight relationship (LWR) of selected commercially importan...
Not AvailableThe paper deals with length-weight relationship (LWR) of selected commercially importan...
The paper deals with length-weight relationship (LWR) of selected commercially important marine fish...
Not AvailableThe length weight relationships (LWRs) of ten tropical finfish species from north easte...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationships (LWRs) of three fish species: Scomberomorus commerson, Ale...
Not AvailableLength weight relationship is reported for 11 fish species collected from the Mandovi-Z...
Not AvailableLength weight relationship is reported for 11 fish species collected from the Mandovi-Z...
Not AvailableLength weight relationship is reported for 11 fish species collected from the Mandovi-Z...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationship (LWR) was estimated for 12 elasmobranch species; five ...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationship (LWR) was estimated for 12 elasmobranch species; five ...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationship (LWR) was estimated for 12 elasmobranch species; five ...
Not AvailableLength‐weight relationships (LWR) for eight deep‐sea fishes belonging to six families ...
Not AvailableThe paper deals with length-weight relationship (LWR) of selected commercially importan...
Not AvailableThe paper deals with length-weight relationship (LWR) of selected commercially importan...
Not AvailableThe paper deals with length-weight relationship (LWR) of selected commercially importan...
Not AvailableThe paper deals with length-weight relationship (LWR) of selected commercially importan...
Not AvailableThe paper deals with length-weight relationship (LWR) of selected commercially importan...
The paper deals with length-weight relationship (LWR) of selected commercially important marine fish...
Not AvailableThe length weight relationships (LWRs) of ten tropical finfish species from north easte...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationships (LWRs) of three fish species: Scomberomorus commerson, Ale...
Not AvailableLength weight relationship is reported for 11 fish species collected from the Mandovi-Z...
Not AvailableLength weight relationship is reported for 11 fish species collected from the Mandovi-Z...
Not AvailableLength weight relationship is reported for 11 fish species collected from the Mandovi-Z...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationship (LWR) was estimated for 12 elasmobranch species; five ...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationship (LWR) was estimated for 12 elasmobranch species; five ...
Not AvailableLength–weight relationship (LWR) was estimated for 12 elasmobranch species; five ...
Not AvailableLength‐weight relationships (LWR) for eight deep‐sea fishes belonging to six families ...