This article sets forth a general theory of the justification of legal punishment based on virtue ethics and republican political theory. Criminal law serves not only to deter and take retribution, but also to inculcate virtue. This theory explains why, for example, people do not consciously abide by law. They just do, because they have no desire to do things that are contrary to the criminal law. This conception of virtue as well-ordered desire is distinctively Aristotelian. The political justification for inculcating virtue by means of criminal law is the classic republican conception of government as being devoted specifically to the inculcation of virtue
In criminal law circles, the accepted wisdom is that there are two and only two true justifications ...
The political theory we choose, as George Fletcher has insisted, will invariably shape our answers...
The aim of this paper is to outline a political theory of criminal law, that is, a theory that does ...
This article sets forth a general theory of the justification of legal punishment based on virtue et...
In this chapter I use virtue theory to critique certain contemporary punishment practices. From the ...
One of the abiding concerns of the philosophy of law has been to establish the relationship between ...
Virtue jurisprudence is a normative and explanatory theory of law that utilizes the resources of ...
In this article, Markus Dubber considers two questions. First, as a matter of political theory, how ...
The last half-century has seen a steady loss of confidence in the defensibility of a duty to obey th...
This paper sketches an aretaic theory of legislation. Such a theory posits the flourishing of humans...
Pay-to-stay jails expose the moral tension between the dominant theories of punishment: retributivis...
Many criminal law theorists find the punishment of harm puzzling. They argue that acts should be eva...
The article discusses the author\u27s contention that the rule of law in places such as America can ...
The one thing that most scholars of criminal law agree upon is that we are in desperate need of a co...
Constitutional orders punish — and they punish abundantly. However, analysis of the constitutionalit...
In criminal law circles, the accepted wisdom is that there are two and only two true justifications ...
The political theory we choose, as George Fletcher has insisted, will invariably shape our answers...
The aim of this paper is to outline a political theory of criminal law, that is, a theory that does ...
This article sets forth a general theory of the justification of legal punishment based on virtue et...
In this chapter I use virtue theory to critique certain contemporary punishment practices. From the ...
One of the abiding concerns of the philosophy of law has been to establish the relationship between ...
Virtue jurisprudence is a normative and explanatory theory of law that utilizes the resources of ...
In this article, Markus Dubber considers two questions. First, as a matter of political theory, how ...
The last half-century has seen a steady loss of confidence in the defensibility of a duty to obey th...
This paper sketches an aretaic theory of legislation. Such a theory posits the flourishing of humans...
Pay-to-stay jails expose the moral tension between the dominant theories of punishment: retributivis...
Many criminal law theorists find the punishment of harm puzzling. They argue that acts should be eva...
The article discusses the author\u27s contention that the rule of law in places such as America can ...
The one thing that most scholars of criminal law agree upon is that we are in desperate need of a co...
Constitutional orders punish — and they punish abundantly. However, analysis of the constitutionalit...
In criminal law circles, the accepted wisdom is that there are two and only two true justifications ...
The political theory we choose, as George Fletcher has insisted, will invariably shape our answers...
The aim of this paper is to outline a political theory of criminal law, that is, a theory that does ...