Molk in realno. Pričevanje med nemožnostjo in dolžnostjo

In this essay the author proceeds in four stages. After 1) tracing out Lyotard's derivation of his concept of the impossible, yet necessary testimony via his analysis of victimisation of a speaking being deprived of the means to present the harm he or she has sufferd, particularly as it occurs in his The Differend, 2) to addresses the problem of a »feeling of pain« as a tenant-lieu of the missing witness; 3) admitting contrasting light from Lacan's elaboration of the two modes of being silent, silere and tacere, in order to 4) conclude with reflections on the subjective destitution implied in Lyotard's conception of art as witness.V prispevku avtorica napreduje v štirih stopnjah. 1) Slediti Lyotardovi izpeljavi koncepta nemogočega, a nujnega pričevanja, opirajoč se na njegovo analizo viktimizaci-je govorečega bitja, oropanega sredstev za prikaz krivice, ki mu je bila prizadejana, kot je razvita v njegovi knjigi LeDiffered; 2) obdelati problem »občutka bolečine« kot tenant-lieu konstitutivno manjkajoče priče: 3) soočiti Lyotardovo koncepcijo neme priče z Lacanovo elaboracijo dveh modusov molka, silere in tacere, zato da bi na koncu 4) razpravljanje sklenila z razmišljanjem o subjektivni destituciji, kotje implicirana v Lyotardovi koncepciji umetnosti kot priče