© 2019, Polish Academy of Sciences - Institute of Philosophy and Sociology. All rights reserved. Deep disagreement is a disagreement about epistemic principles, pertaining to the methods of justification and argumentation. Relying on Ludwig Wittgenstein’s conceptual metaphor of “hinges,” researchers arrive at the conclusion that deep disagreement cannot be resolved. This conclusion leads to relativism in the theory of argumentation. The aim of the article is to show that in the situation of deep disagreement it is theoretically possible to ascertain which of the positions of the participants of the argument has a better epistemic status, and hence, is argumentatively virtuous
According to Fogelin’s account of deep disagreements, disputes caused by a clash in framework propos...
Fogelin’s (1985) Wittgensteinian view of deep disagreement as allowing no rational resolution has be...
In response to earlier papers in Informal Logic by Robert Fogelin and Andrew Lugg, this paper explor...
© 2019, Polish Academy of Sciences - Institute of Philosophy and Sociology. All rights reserved. Dee...
Some disagreements concern our most fundamental beliefs, principles, values, or worldviews, such as ...
What is the epistemological significance of deep disagreement? Part I explored the nature of deep di...
What is the nature of deep disagreement? In this paper, I consider two similar albeit seemingly riva...
Deep disagreement is characterized as being a disagreement in which the interlocutors are unable to ...
According to the Wittgensteinian view of deep disagreement, deep disagreements are disagreements ove...
The purpose of this paper is to bring together work on disagreement in both epistemology and argumen...
Disagreements come in all shapes and sizes, but epistemologists and argumentation theorists have sin...
In this paper I begin by examining Fogelin’s account of deep disagreement. My contention is that thi...
ABSTRACT: The theoretical possibility of deep disagreement gives rise to an important practical prob...
In this paper, I will argue for a complex of three theses. First, that the problem of deep disagreem...
In the epistemology of disagreement literature an underdeveloped argument defending the claim that a...
According to Fogelin’s account of deep disagreements, disputes caused by a clash in framework propos...
Fogelin’s (1985) Wittgensteinian view of deep disagreement as allowing no rational resolution has be...
In response to earlier papers in Informal Logic by Robert Fogelin and Andrew Lugg, this paper explor...
© 2019, Polish Academy of Sciences - Institute of Philosophy and Sociology. All rights reserved. Dee...
Some disagreements concern our most fundamental beliefs, principles, values, or worldviews, such as ...
What is the epistemological significance of deep disagreement? Part I explored the nature of deep di...
What is the nature of deep disagreement? In this paper, I consider two similar albeit seemingly riva...
Deep disagreement is characterized as being a disagreement in which the interlocutors are unable to ...
According to the Wittgensteinian view of deep disagreement, deep disagreements are disagreements ove...
The purpose of this paper is to bring together work on disagreement in both epistemology and argumen...
Disagreements come in all shapes and sizes, but epistemologists and argumentation theorists have sin...
In this paper I begin by examining Fogelin’s account of deep disagreement. My contention is that thi...
ABSTRACT: The theoretical possibility of deep disagreement gives rise to an important practical prob...
In this paper, I will argue for a complex of three theses. First, that the problem of deep disagreem...
In the epistemology of disagreement literature an underdeveloped argument defending the claim that a...
According to Fogelin’s account of deep disagreements, disputes caused by a clash in framework propos...
Fogelin’s (1985) Wittgensteinian view of deep disagreement as allowing no rational resolution has be...
In response to earlier papers in Informal Logic by Robert Fogelin and Andrew Lugg, this paper explor...