ACTIO CIVILIS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Actio civilis označava zahtjeve koji spadaju u građansko pravo, ali se iz razloga procesne ekonomije pridružuju kaznenenom postupku. Tom terminu najviše se bliži imovinskopravni zahtjev, međutim s obzirom na usku povezanost sa oduzimanjem imovinske koristi, te na veliku prisutnost građanskih propisa, potrebno je spomenuti i navedenu mjeru. Ono što je bitno naglasiti je da oba instituta imaju za cilj nekakvu vrstu obeštećenja. Imovinskopravni zahtjev obeštećuje oštećenika, a oduzimanje imovinske koristi ''obeštećuje'' Republiku Hrvatsku, premda se to ne bi moglo nazvati obeštećenjem u pravom smislu te riječi jer se ta korist oduzima i uplaćuje u proračun Republike Hrvatske. Oba postupka su postupci koji se pridružuju kaznenom postupku, odnosno raspravljanje o njima ne predstavlja procesnu pretpostavku, oba se pokreću prijedlogom ovlaštene osobe te je u konačnici potrebno naglasiti prednost imovinskopravnog zahtjeva pred mjerom oduzimanja imovinske koristi. Međutim, oba instituta u praksi nastoje ostvariti načelo da nitko ne može zadržati imovinsku korist ostvarenu kaznenim djelom.Actio civilis signifies claims that fall under civil law, but for process economics reasons are joined with criminal proceedings. The closest to that term is civil claim in criminal proceedings, however considering the close connection with confiscation of property gain, and the great presence of civil regulations, it is neccessary to point out the stated measure. What is important to emphasize is that both institutes have the goal of achieving some sort of compensation. Civil claim in criminal proceedings compensates the injured person and the confiscation of property gain „compensates“ the Republic of Croatia, although that couldn't be called compensation in the true sense of the word because that gain is taken away and paid into the budget of the Republic of Croatia. Both proceedings are proceedings that are joined with criminal proceedings, respectively discussing about them doesn't present a process assumption, both are initiated with the proposition of the authorized person and ultimately it is neccessary to emphasize the advantage of the civil claim in criminal proceedings before a measure of taking away property gain. However, both institutes in practice try to achieve the principle that nobody can keep the property gain realized by felony