Add to ORKGThe purpose of the present Article is not to propose yet another route toward logical reconciliation of the sovereign-immunity cases; but, on the contrary, to urge general acceptance of the fact that such reconciliation is, and will probably remain, unattainable; to explain why this is so; and to suggest why it is not so bad. This modest goal will be attempted through a detailed examination of two recent Supreme Court cases and their most pertinent antecedents
The doctrine of sovereign immunity dictates that courts lack jurisdiction to review cases challengin...
In recent years, the Supreme Court has substantially expanded the scope of state sovereign immunity....
Immunities from suit, whether for governments or government officials, occupy a semi-sacred place in...
The purpose of this Article is to generate support for three legislative proposals that will rectify...
Although more than one hundred and fifty years old, the case vivifying the concept of sovereign immu...
The morass of recent Supreme Court state sovereign immunity jurisprudence is closely examined. Rathe...
Very early in our history we took steps to insure that the.rule of law, as expressed in the Constitu...
With the enduring doctrine of federal sovereign immunity, it is too late in the day to suggest that ...
Under the concept of sovereign or governmental immunity, a state may not be sued in tort without its...
This article will explore recent court decisions discussion the issue of sovereign state immunity fr...
As I suggest below in Part I, federal sovereign immunity was a doctrine of limited effect in the ear...
This Article attempts to clarify the doctrine of sovereign immunity and its exceptions in its applic...
In discussing the current statute abrogating the doctrine of sovereign immunity, the authors trace t...
The immunity of a sovereign and its agents from liability for tortious conduct has long been a part ...
Professor Hill maintains that the Constitution was grounded on an understanding that the states woul...
The doctrine of sovereign immunity dictates that courts lack jurisdiction to review cases challengin...
In recent years, the Supreme Court has substantially expanded the scope of state sovereign immunity....
Immunities from suit, whether for governments or government officials, occupy a semi-sacred place in...
The purpose of this Article is to generate support for three legislative proposals that will rectify...
Although more than one hundred and fifty years old, the case vivifying the concept of sovereign immu...
The morass of recent Supreme Court state sovereign immunity jurisprudence is closely examined. Rathe...
Very early in our history we took steps to insure that the.rule of law, as expressed in the Constitu...
With the enduring doctrine of federal sovereign immunity, it is too late in the day to suggest that ...
Under the concept of sovereign or governmental immunity, a state may not be sued in tort without its...
This article will explore recent court decisions discussion the issue of sovereign state immunity fr...
As I suggest below in Part I, federal sovereign immunity was a doctrine of limited effect in the ear...
This Article attempts to clarify the doctrine of sovereign immunity and its exceptions in its applic...
In discussing the current statute abrogating the doctrine of sovereign immunity, the authors trace t...
The immunity of a sovereign and its agents from liability for tortious conduct has long been a part ...
Professor Hill maintains that the Constitution was grounded on an understanding that the states woul...
The doctrine of sovereign immunity dictates that courts lack jurisdiction to review cases challengin...
In recent years, the Supreme Court has substantially expanded the scope of state sovereign immunity....
Immunities from suit, whether for governments or government officials, occupy a semi-sacred place in...