Provenance of the northern part of the Kahramanmaras Peripheral Foreland Basin (Miocene, S Turkey)

WOS: 000286846400004The Miocene Miocene Kahramanmaras Peripheral Foreland Basin (KPFB) resemble to classic foreland basin model, with small differences. In the classic model, both the accretionary wedge and foredeep extend lengthways parallel to the plate margin. In addition, accretionary wedge includes wedge top basin or piggy back basin that extends parallel to foredeep. However, the accretionary wedge of the KPFB contains small half-graben type basins that obliquely intersect the plate margin between the Arabian Plate and the Anatolide-Taurides Platform (due to the irregular shape of the plate boundary). Tectonic lineaments controlled the shape and orientation of these basins and larger main depocentre of the KFPB, which were predominantly filled with deep-sea sediments. This paper focuses on the provenance of features of the KFPB, predominantly was fed from the northern basin margin, while also aiming to resolve the complex basin evolution that occurred during the Miocene. Clasts of Palaeozoic and Mesozoic limestone and ophiolites are common components of the confined deep-water clastic systems, which evolved as elongated trenches in the north-western sector of the KPFB during the Early-Middle Miocene. During the Middle Miocene, continuous thrusting of the northern basin margin to south caused depocentre migration to south-east, through the basin interior. At that time, the north-east and central depocentres of the KPFB were filled primarily by clasts of ophiolite and metamorphic units. The tectonic control on basin fill architecture can be observed anywhere in the KFPB. The principal tectonic features controlled the geometry and orientation of the canyon, the channel geometry of the deep-water slope on the northern basin margin, the frequency and distribution of slump-slide-debris flows and the overall pattern of sedimentation cycles in the stratigraphy of the slope and the central basin floor. Some basin sectors have continuously reactivated and as a result, different sediment entry points with substantial local accumulation of sediment and deformation have evolved on the slope and basin floor. Three scales of provenance were used to investigate the source rock: (a) field-based observation and analysis of conglomerate clasts, (b) modal analysis of sandstone facies and (c) geochemical analysis, all of which were in agreement. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Cukurova UniversityCukurova University [MMF2003BAP1, MMF2003D1]; Aberdeen University, Scotland; UNOCAL, BPThe authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Cukurova University Research Funds MMF2003BAP1 and MMF2003D1 and also the "Turkey 2 Consortium Project of deep-sea sediment" from Aberdeen University, Scotland, sponsored by UNOCAL, BP and ConocoPhillips. Dr. Gill would also like to thank TUBITAK for his PhD scholarship. The authors warmly thank Andrew Racey from BG Energy for chemical analysis of samples and Dr. N. Emre Altun from Mug la University for his editorial contribution. Finally the authors thank Dr. Sarah Boulton, an anonymous reviewer and Prof. Dr. Boris Natalin (associate editor) for their constructive criticism of the paper