Use of advanced echocardiography imaging techniques in the critically ill

Background: Critical care echocardiography has become standard of care in the ICU. New technologies have been developed and have shown potential clinical utility to elucidate myocardial dysfunction not seen with conventional imaging. We sought to determine the feasibility and potential clinical benefit of these techniques in common situations seen in the ICU. Hypothesis: Advanced echo techniques would be feasible in the majority of critically ill patients and have prognostic significance, clinical utility and diagnose cardiac abnormalities, potentially in a more sensitive manner than conventional techniques. Results: (a) Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) Left ventricle and RV analysis with STE was feasibly in ~80% of patients. More dysfunction was found using STE vs conventional analysis. RV dysfunction assessed by STE held significant prognostic relevance in those with septic shock and highlighted subtle dysfunction induced by mechanical ventilation, both in animal and human studies. (b) 3D transthoracic echocardiography (3D TTE) Despite finding 3D TTE feasible in mechanically ventilated ICU patients (LV 72% and RV 55%), it lacked necessary low variability and high precision vs standard measures. (c) Myocardial contrast perfusion echocardiography (MCPE) Assessing acute coronary artery occlusion in the ICU patient is challenging. Troponin elevation, acute ECG changes, regional wall motion analysis on echo and overall clinical acumen often lack diagnostic capabilities. MCPE was found to be feasible in the critically ill and had better association predicting acute coronary artery occlusion vs clinical acumen alone. Conclusions: STE, 3D TTE and MCPE are feasible in the majority of ICU patients. STE may show dysfunction not recognised by conventional imaging. 3D TTE for volumetric analysis is likely not suitable for clinical use at this stage. MCPE may help guide interventions in acute coronary artery occlusion