Challenging the common view that categories are prior to schemata, I argue that Kant considers transcendental schemata and categories to represent different guises of the a priori rules that allow the mind to unify a manifold. Since only transcendental schemata present these rules as ways of unifying successive representations, they can be said to constitute the sensible condition of any a priori cognition of objects. I take Kant to argue, on this basis, that Wolffian metaphysics abstracted from this condition, thus unwarrantedly using categories to obtain a priori knowledge of the soul, the world as such and God.status: publishe
Kant’s Metaphysical Deduction of the Categories justifies their apriority, i.e. that their contents ...
The meaning and validity of Kant’s Kant’s doctrine of schematism remains contested until today. In n...
In my dissertation, I deal with one of the fundamental topics of Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Re...
Challenging the common view that categories are prior to schemata, I argue that Kant considers trans...
In this paper, I argue that once Kant has established his argument about the a priori transcendental...
This article considers the significance of Kant’s schematized categories in the Critique of Pure Rea...
Most commentators agree that the Schematism chapter plays a very important role in the Critique of P...
The thesis focuses on a chapter from Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, "The Schematism of the Pure Con...
The aim of this article is to show that the Schematism chapter of Kant´s "Critique of Pure Reason" p...
This thesis defends an interpretation of the argument that Immanuel Kant calls his Transcendental De...
In the Schematism chapter in the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant introduces a key element in his analy...
The opening sentence of § 16 in the Transcendental Deduction of the Critique of Pure Reason states t...
The “Transcendental Analytic” of the Critique of Pure Reason contains a complex theory of the meanin...
Hume famously argues that we have no idea of objectively necessary connections between existents. Bu...
Immanuel Kant’s ‘Transcendental Deduction of the Categories’ addresses issues centrally debated toda...
Kant’s Metaphysical Deduction of the Categories justifies their apriority, i.e. that their contents ...
The meaning and validity of Kant’s Kant’s doctrine of schematism remains contested until today. In n...
In my dissertation, I deal with one of the fundamental topics of Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Re...
Challenging the common view that categories are prior to schemata, I argue that Kant considers trans...
In this paper, I argue that once Kant has established his argument about the a priori transcendental...
This article considers the significance of Kant’s schematized categories in the Critique of Pure Rea...
Most commentators agree that the Schematism chapter plays a very important role in the Critique of P...
The thesis focuses on a chapter from Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, "The Schematism of the Pure Con...
The aim of this article is to show that the Schematism chapter of Kant´s "Critique of Pure Reason" p...
This thesis defends an interpretation of the argument that Immanuel Kant calls his Transcendental De...
In the Schematism chapter in the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant introduces a key element in his analy...
The opening sentence of § 16 in the Transcendental Deduction of the Critique of Pure Reason states t...
The “Transcendental Analytic” of the Critique of Pure Reason contains a complex theory of the meanin...
Hume famously argues that we have no idea of objectively necessary connections between existents. Bu...
Immanuel Kant’s ‘Transcendental Deduction of the Categories’ addresses issues centrally debated toda...
Kant’s Metaphysical Deduction of the Categories justifies their apriority, i.e. that their contents ...
The meaning and validity of Kant’s Kant’s doctrine of schematism remains contested until today. In n...
In my dissertation, I deal with one of the fundamental topics of Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Re...