Topics to cover… What is the workflow of the peer review process? What drive the decision-making of editors? What drive the decision-making of reviewers? What underpin the academic resilience of authors in the structural peer-review process
Ever-increasing numbers of manuscripts, grant proposals, working group documents, position papers, e...
Peer review is a critical part of the publishing process at JM3, as it is for most science journals....
Aims: To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer revie...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
<div>Peer review is a process in which academic research is subjected to critical evaluation by othe...
Peer reviewers plays a crucial for scientific journals today. The review process is a critical view ...
Peer review is one way scholarly journals can maintain rigor and increase the quality of published m...
The peer-review system, commonly considered critical for research integrity and rigour, has been cri...
The quality of an article is a critical parameter for the success of any scholarly journal, and the ...
There is need for large numbers of high-quality peer reviews across journals. This chapter provides ...
Peer review is a central tenet in research across all disciplines. It is a key feature in monitoring...
Peer review, which refers to the review of manuscripts by field experts in the field before they are...
For the August 2014 talk, we discussed traditional peer review. We outlined the origins and history ...
Peer review is a mainstay of scientific publishing and, while peer reviewers and scientists r...
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby dist...
Ever-increasing numbers of manuscripts, grant proposals, working group documents, position papers, e...
Peer review is a critical part of the publishing process at JM3, as it is for most science journals....
Aims: To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer revie...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
<div>Peer review is a process in which academic research is subjected to critical evaluation by othe...
Peer reviewers plays a crucial for scientific journals today. The review process is a critical view ...
Peer review is one way scholarly journals can maintain rigor and increase the quality of published m...
The peer-review system, commonly considered critical for research integrity and rigour, has been cri...
The quality of an article is a critical parameter for the success of any scholarly journal, and the ...
There is need for large numbers of high-quality peer reviews across journals. This chapter provides ...
Peer review is a central tenet in research across all disciplines. It is a key feature in monitoring...
Peer review, which refers to the review of manuscripts by field experts in the field before they are...
For the August 2014 talk, we discussed traditional peer review. We outlined the origins and history ...
Peer review is a mainstay of scientific publishing and, while peer reviewers and scientists r...
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby dist...
Ever-increasing numbers of manuscripts, grant proposals, working group documents, position papers, e...
Peer review is a critical part of the publishing process at JM3, as it is for most science journals....
Aims: To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer revie...