O'Leary, J ORCiD: 0000-0002-8062-8062This article considers the development of the law surrounding judge alone trials in the ACT, which culminated in the passage of the Criminal Proceedings Legislation Amendment Act 2011 (ACT). It proposes that the amended legislation, despite assertions to the contrary in the compatibility and explanatory statements, is incompatible with the right to a fair trial by an independent, impartial tribunal articulated in the Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) (‘HRA’).
The unmet demand for legal aid generally and for criminal law matters in particular, has grown in ta...
This article criticises H.L. Ho’s argument that the exclusion of improperly obtained evidence can be...
Appellate harmless error review, an early twentieth-century innovation prompted by concerns of effic...
This article considers the development of the law surrounding judge alone trials in the ACT, which c...
ABSTRACT: The article presents a few issues about the importance and necessity of a court-appointed ...
Original article can be found at : http://www.criminalbar.com/ Copyright Criminal Bar Association [F...
This article critiques the impact of the European Convention on Human Rights, as interpreted in the ...
This article examines Supreme Court jurisprudence regarding three circumstances in which the communi...
Original article can be found at : http://www.vathek.com/ Copyright Vathek Publishing [Full text of ...
For years, judges and legislatures in common-law jurisdictions have struggled to develop effective a...
This article explores the disparate jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the appe...
That an accused receives a fair trial is essential to the legitimacy of international criminal court...
This is a book review for Obstacles to Fairness in Criminal Proceedings: Individual Rights and Insti...
The European Convention on Human Rights 1950 represented a radical endeavour to create a set of pan-...
Article Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 1998. Published online by...
The unmet demand for legal aid generally and for criminal law matters in particular, has grown in ta...
This article criticises H.L. Ho’s argument that the exclusion of improperly obtained evidence can be...
Appellate harmless error review, an early twentieth-century innovation prompted by concerns of effic...
This article considers the development of the law surrounding judge alone trials in the ACT, which c...
ABSTRACT: The article presents a few issues about the importance and necessity of a court-appointed ...
Original article can be found at : http://www.criminalbar.com/ Copyright Criminal Bar Association [F...
This article critiques the impact of the European Convention on Human Rights, as interpreted in the ...
This article examines Supreme Court jurisprudence regarding three circumstances in which the communi...
Original article can be found at : http://www.vathek.com/ Copyright Vathek Publishing [Full text of ...
For years, judges and legislatures in common-law jurisdictions have struggled to develop effective a...
This article explores the disparate jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the appe...
That an accused receives a fair trial is essential to the legitimacy of international criminal court...
This is a book review for Obstacles to Fairness in Criminal Proceedings: Individual Rights and Insti...
The European Convention on Human Rights 1950 represented a radical endeavour to create a set of pan-...
Article Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 1998. Published online by...
The unmet demand for legal aid generally and for criminal law matters in particular, has grown in ta...
This article criticises H.L. Ho’s argument that the exclusion of improperly obtained evidence can be...
Appellate harmless error review, an early twentieth-century innovation prompted by concerns of effic...