Use of innovative concrete mixes for improved constructability and sustainability of bridge decks.

PDFTech ReportK-TRAN: KU-11-8C1872Bridge decksReinforced concrete bridgesCondition surveysHigh performance concreteCrackingGirdersOverlays (Pavements)Synthetic fibersAdmixturesSteelPrestressed concreteKansasKansas. Dept. of TransportationShrestha, Pankaj NarayanHarley, AmberPendergrass, BenjaminDarwin, DavidBrowning, JoAnnUniversity of Kansas. Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural EngineeringUS Transportation CollectionBridge deck crack surveys were performed on twelve bridges on US-59 south of Lawrence, Kansas, to determine the effects ofmixture proportions, concrete properties, deck type, and girder type on the crack density of reinforced concrete bridge decks. Ofthe twelve decks surveyed, eight are supported by prestressed concrete girders and four are supported by steel girders. Four of thedecks supported by prestressed girders are cast on partial-depth precast deck panels, two are monolithic with synthetic fibers, andtwo have overlays. Of the four decks supported by steel girders, two have silica fume overlays (SFO) and two are monolithic. Oneof two decks with a silica fume overlay contains synthetic fibers in the overlay. Following the surveys, crack maps were plottedand analyzed and cracking trends were observed. The results for the US-59 bridge decks are compared with crack densitiesobtained in a study of low-cracking high-performance concrete (LC-HPC) bridge decks.The monolithic concrete bridge decks supported by prestressed concrete girders within this study exhibit less cracking thandecks supported by steel girders. At an age of approximately three and a half years, the US-59 monolithic decks supported byprestressed girders with deck panels are not displaying significant cracking; most of the cracks are short transverse cracks alignedwith the joints between the deck panels. The US-59 decks supported by prestressed girders with overlays exhibit significantly morecracking than the decks on prestressed girders without overlays. Bridge decks supported by steel girders without overlays haveslightly higher crack densities than the decks with overlays. No benefits of using fibers in either the overlay or deck have beenobserved in this study, the sample size, however, is small. An increase in crack density was observed with an increase in averageconcrete slump for decks supported by both prestressed and steel girders. Decks with deck panels supported by prestressed girdersexhibited an increased crack density with an increase in paste content