The relationship of written examination performance to safe driving : a literature review with recommended methods for developing exams.

10733860PDFTech ReportVHTRC 84-R41VirginiaVirginia Transportation Research CouncilAtkins, Alden LVirginia Highway & Transportation Research CouncilUS Transportation CollectionThis report reviews the literature concerning written driver license examinations. The research literature shows that current written examinations are poor predictors of unsafe drivers. Although some studies demonstrate significant relationships between one's written examination score and accidents, these relationships are significant only for drivers with certain combinations of sex, age, and level of education. Even for those classes of persons where a significant relationship was found, failing examinations is very over-incluslve. Thus, many safe drivers would have to be failed to screen out one unsafe driver. The conclusions, however, are based upon tests which are currently used and which have been widely criticized as not clearly testing knowledge or as not being statistically reliable. Another reason to administer written examinations is to mend information deficiencies. This can be particularly effective if drivers can be classified into groups with identified information deficiencies. This report also reviews classifications with identified information deficiencies, and it suggests how further research can be conducted with properly developed examinations