Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Retrofit Recommendations for State Highway Bridges: Case Studies

6681963012009Final report; Sept. 2006-Apr. 2009.PDFTech ReportUT-09-0807-9035Earthquake engineeringEarthquake resistant structuresEarthquake resistant designBridgesMaintenanceEarthquake hazard analysisEarthquake resistant designBridgesMaintenance and repairUtahUnited StatesUtah. Dept. of Transportation. Research DivisionShafieezadeh, AbdollahHu, WenyingErduran, EmrahRyan, Keri L.Utah State University. Dept. of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUtah. Dept. of Transportation. Research DivisionUS Transportation CollectionMuch of Utah\u2019s population dwells in a seismically active region, and many of the bridges connecting transportation lifelines predate the rigorous seismic design standards that have been developed in the past 10-20 years. Other states in the west have instituted seismic retrofit programs in response to damage to transportation networks in past California earthquakes. In a parallel report, seismic retrofit guidelines were developed for Utah based on the Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures published by FHWA. In this report, representative case study bridges are evaluated in detail using the guidelines. The case study evaluations include the following for each bridge: (1) selection and presentation of analysis method, (2) development of numerical model in LARSA 4D and/or additional programs as needed, (3) evaluation of the seismic response of the unretrofitted bridge, (4) design of a possible retrofit scheme. The bridges evaluated include a four-span simply supported prestressed concrete girder bridge, a four-span continuous concrete T-beam, and an eight-span curved steel girder bridge with in-span pin and hanger joints. A variety of different evaluation methods are presented including linear response spectrum analysis for demand assessment, capacity spectrum method and pushover analysis for capacity assessment, and nonlinear response history analysis. A variety of retrofit techniques are presented including column jacketing, cable restrainers, selectively closing pin and hanger joints, and seismic isolation. The varied examples and techniques presented in this report are meant to be representative of assessment and applicable retrofit approaches for many of the bridges in the state inventory that may be seismically deficient.75