Using Noninvasive Genetics to Compare How a California Freeway Affects Gene Flow in a Disturbance-averse Versus a Disturbance-tolerant Species

16423812017PDFTech ReportNCST-20170400, CA17-2978Data analysisData collectionGeneticsRural highwaysTraffic volumeWildlifeWildlife crossingsEnvironmentHighwaysPlanning and ForecastingUnited StatesCaliforniaNational Center for Sustainable TransportationCoen, AmandaSchreier, AndreaNational Center for Sustainable TransportationUniversity of California, Davis. Institute of Transportation StudiesUniversity Transportation Centers Program (U.S.)US Transportation CollectionRoads networks may have profound impacts on the viability of wildlife populations. In particular, highways can be barriers to wildlife movement, leading to genetic diversity loss, inbreeding, and increased extinction risk for small, isolated populations on either side. The effects that highways have on wildlife movement can be variable, dependent on the unique dispersal behaviors of individual species. In this study, we test the hypothesis that highways will pose less of a barrier to coyotes, a species tolerant of human disturbance, than to gray fox, a species more sensitive to disturbance. We used landscape genetic tools to determine whether State Route 49, part of the California Essential Habitat Connectivity Project, was a barrier to coyote or gray fox movements. Genetic diversity among both coyotes and gray foxes was high and comparable to other studies. We found little evidence of contemporary genetic structure across State Route 49 for either species. All genetic differentiation that we observed was driven by family structure and relatives were found on both sides of the highway. Coyotes exhibited a significant signal of isolation by distance and a positive association between traffic volume and genetic distance. There are two possible explanations for these findings. State Route 49 may be permeable to coyote and gray fox movement due to successful road crossings. Alternatively, State Route 49 is a barrier to coyote and gray fox movement but there may be a time lag between initial reduction of gene flow and detection of population structure.78