Student comments on the Tennessee Supreme Court decision “State of Tennessee v. Antoine Perrier”. The law now holds that the Tennessee legislature intended that the phrase “not engaged in unlawful activity” contained in the self-defense statute constitutes a condition on an individual’s privilege to not retreat prior to exercising self-defense. Next, the trial court now possesses the duty of determining whether a defendant was engaged in unlawful activity at the time of the alleged self-defense as to negate the applicable instruction. Those holdings are the newest additions to Tennessee law
The American states have generally codified in one form or other the common law felony murder rule ...
The Court determined that (1) the challenge-to-fight theory under NRS 200.450 is not vague and overb...
The article discusses the Confrontation Clause and summarizes the state of the law before the U.S. S...
Student comments on the Tennessee Supreme Court decision “State of Tennessee v. Antoine Perrier”. T...
Student comments on the Tennessee Supreme Court decision “State of Tennessee v. Sedrick Clayton”. Al...
Homicide: In Ivy v. State\u27 the defendant, in the course of a fight with A, stabbed B, a peacemake...
Student comments on the Tennessee Supreme Court decision “State of Tennessee v. Kevin E. Trent”. The...
In the field of Criminal Law and Procedure, the Tennessee Supreme Court might be said to have comple...
In Tennessee v. Garner, the United States Supreme Court rejected the common law rule which had permi...
CASES OF CURRENT INTEREST AND IMPORTANCE PREVIOUSLY NOTED Baker v. State, 184 Tenn. 503 (1947), 1 Va...
For many years there has been some controversy over whether an individual has the right to endanger ...
Criminal Law-SELF-DEFENSE-RETREAT-INSTRUCTION ON DEFENSE OF HOME NEED NOT BE GIVEN WHERE VICTIM AND ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended the no-retreat dwelling house exception to the self-defense ...
This note will chart the historical development of the imperfect right of self-defense and will emph...
Under the initial aggressor doctrine, an “initial aggressor” loses the right to claim self-defense. ...
The American states have generally codified in one form or other the common law felony murder rule ...
The Court determined that (1) the challenge-to-fight theory under NRS 200.450 is not vague and overb...
The article discusses the Confrontation Clause and summarizes the state of the law before the U.S. S...
Student comments on the Tennessee Supreme Court decision “State of Tennessee v. Antoine Perrier”. T...
Student comments on the Tennessee Supreme Court decision “State of Tennessee v. Sedrick Clayton”. Al...
Homicide: In Ivy v. State\u27 the defendant, in the course of a fight with A, stabbed B, a peacemake...
Student comments on the Tennessee Supreme Court decision “State of Tennessee v. Kevin E. Trent”. The...
In the field of Criminal Law and Procedure, the Tennessee Supreme Court might be said to have comple...
In Tennessee v. Garner, the United States Supreme Court rejected the common law rule which had permi...
CASES OF CURRENT INTEREST AND IMPORTANCE PREVIOUSLY NOTED Baker v. State, 184 Tenn. 503 (1947), 1 Va...
For many years there has been some controversy over whether an individual has the right to endanger ...
Criminal Law-SELF-DEFENSE-RETREAT-INSTRUCTION ON DEFENSE OF HOME NEED NOT BE GIVEN WHERE VICTIM AND ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended the no-retreat dwelling house exception to the self-defense ...
This note will chart the historical development of the imperfect right of self-defense and will emph...
Under the initial aggressor doctrine, an “initial aggressor” loses the right to claim self-defense. ...
The American states have generally codified in one form or other the common law felony murder rule ...
The Court determined that (1) the challenge-to-fight theory under NRS 200.450 is not vague and overb...
The article discusses the Confrontation Clause and summarizes the state of the law before the U.S. S...