DIY for problem pets: A possible welfare issue

The abundance of companion animal behavior modification and training aids available on the open market offer the potential for misleading those desperate to deal with their animal’s behavior. The quality of product information is varied, as are the scientific facts explaining appropriate and effective use of the aid(s). Potential risks due to unintentional misuse remain high, with associated possibilities for compromising welfare. The result is that symptomatic elements of the behavior receive prescriptive treatment, without identifying and engaging with the underlying cause of the behavior.Attitudes to such items are influenced by perceptions of both human-animal relationships and information obtained from perceived authority figures. The status given to these is questionable as the source may range widely from qualified behaviorists/trainers to other owners and retail assistants. There is a trend towards a “quick fix” culture through purchasing products. This neglects the importance of building an in-depth understanding of the behavior, and associated practical skills necessary to implement applied scientific approaches, which are fundamental to treatment.Potential for damage through the misuse of dog training and behavior modification devices has been documented, but as yet not extensively researched. This paper will consider four anti-barking devices; a spray, an ultra-sonic and a shock collar and an anti-barking muzzle as examples of products available on the open market. It will analyze the content of accompanying product literature and alternative sources of support available at point of purchase