Add to ORKGConsumer protection has come of age. The heightened appreciation of the consumer\u27s plight has not been matched, however, by an equal commitment to providing effective programs for vindicating his cause. As a practical matter the consumer may be unable to assert his rights. Suits to enforce consumer rights are costly and are not likely to be brought when each individual claim is counted only in the tens of dollars
A non-resident consumer confers jurisdiction on a creditor in a creditors\u27 haven through a clause...
Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure limits the territorial jurisdiction of federal distri...
The mass action provision in the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 provides a federal forum for cert...
Section II of this paper briefly sets out the jurisdictional scheme of the 1984 Act. Section III pre...
In recent years, there has been an increase in consumer protection class action litigation in federa...
No coherent or cohesive procedure or theory has emerged either in regard to the entire question of p...
Congress has given the federal district courts original and removal jurisdiction of all civil action...
A recent congressional amendment of federal district court jurisdictional requirements for both dive...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that for purposes of federal jurisdiction arising un...
With the adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1938, Congress finally attempted to pro...
The statutory authority for employee suits under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is found in se...
Hoping to keep federal court dockets free of petty claims and thereby to reduce the delay in bringin...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that 28 U.S.C. § 1367 grants the federal court supplemen...
Plaintiff began his action for breach of contract in a state court of Indiana. On defendant\u27s tim...
The long-term security of civil liberties in the United States must in the end depend upon the spiri...
A non-resident consumer confers jurisdiction on a creditor in a creditors\u27 haven through a clause...
Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure limits the territorial jurisdiction of federal distri...
The mass action provision in the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 provides a federal forum for cert...
Section II of this paper briefly sets out the jurisdictional scheme of the 1984 Act. Section III pre...
In recent years, there has been an increase in consumer protection class action litigation in federa...
No coherent or cohesive procedure or theory has emerged either in regard to the entire question of p...
Congress has given the federal district courts original and removal jurisdiction of all civil action...
A recent congressional amendment of federal district court jurisdictional requirements for both dive...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that for purposes of federal jurisdiction arising un...
With the adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1938, Congress finally attempted to pro...
The statutory authority for employee suits under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is found in se...
Hoping to keep federal court dockets free of petty claims and thereby to reduce the delay in bringin...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that 28 U.S.C. § 1367 grants the federal court supplemen...
Plaintiff began his action for breach of contract in a state court of Indiana. On defendant\u27s tim...
The long-term security of civil liberties in the United States must in the end depend upon the spiri...
A non-resident consumer confers jurisdiction on a creditor in a creditors\u27 haven through a clause...
Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure limits the territorial jurisdiction of federal distri...
The mass action provision in the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 provides a federal forum for cert...