Europeanization of the slovenian administrative judiciary

V tem magistrskem delu je obravnavan institut upravnega spora, ki ga ureja Zakon o upravnem sporu in zagotavlja sodno varstvo pravic in koristi posameznikov nasproti osebam, ki odločajo v upravnem postopku (državnim organom, organom lokalnih skupnosti, nosilcem javnih pooblastil), kadar ni z zakonom določeno kakšno drugo pravno varstvo. Sodni nadzor nad njihovim delovanjem na prvi stopnji izvaja neodvisno in nepristransko specializirano sodišče, tj. Upravno sodišče RS, na drugi stopnji pa Vrhovno sodišče RS, razen če zakon določa drugače. Za celovito razumevanje pravne ureditve upravnega spora je potrebno obravnavati tudi pravo Evropske unije in EKČP oziroma z njo povezano sodno prakso ESČP. Slovenija se je z vstopom v Evropsko unijo zavezala vpeljati pravna pravila EU v svoj nacionalni pravni sistem, posledično so jih vsi organi držav članic pri svojem delu dolžni upoštevati. EU je praviloma izvrševanje prava EU prepustila državam članicam oziroma njihovim pristojnim organom, pri čemer ne praviloma določa, kako mora država članica organizirati svojo lastno upravo in nasploh javno oblast, kar se odraža v načelu nacionalne institucionalne avtonomije. Prav tako je tukaj potrebno omeniti načelo nacionalne postopkovne avtonomije (in njegove meje). Vseeno pa pravo EU vpliva na upravno sodstvo s pomočjo instituta predhodnega odločanja, s katerim Sodišče EU podaja razlago prava EU, pa tudi na druge načine, kot je prikazano v tej magistrski nalogi. Dodatno na slovensko upravno sodstvo vpliva EKČP, predvsem pravica do poštenega sojenja, ki je zajeta v njenem 6. členu. Zaradi kršitve tega člena je bila Republika Slovenija že obsojena zaradi odsotnosti glavne obravnave v postopku pred Upravnim sodiščem in sojenja zaradi nepotrebnega odlašanja.This master\u27s thesis deals with the institute of administrative dispute, which is regulated by the Administrative Dispute Act and provides judicial protection of the rights and benefits of individuals against administrative authorities who make decisions in administrative proceedings (state bodies, bodies of local communities, holders of public authority), unless otherwise provided by other legal protection. The judicial review of their operation at first instance is made by Administrative Court of the Republic of Slovenia, and at the second instance the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, unless otherwise provided by law. In order to fully understand the legal regulation of an administrative dispute, it is also necessary to consider the law of the European Union and the ECHR or the ECtHR case-law. With its accession to the European Union, Slovenia has committed itself to introduce EU legal rules into its national legal system. All Member States authorities are obliged to comply with them in their work. The EU left the enforcement of EU law to the Member States or their competent authorities, without generally determining how a Member State should organize its own administration and, in general, public authority, which is reflected in the principle of national institutional autonomy. The principle of national procedural autonomy (and its limits) should also be mentioned here. However, EU law influences administrative justice through a preliminary ruling institute whereby the EU Court of Justice interprets EU law, as well as in other ways, as illustrated in this master\u27s thesis. The Slovenian administrative judiciary is additionally influenced by the ECHR, in particular the right to a fair trial, which is covered by Article 6. For violation of this Article, the Republic of Slovenia has already been convicted for the lack of main trial in Administrative Court’s proceedings and for the unnecessary delay in trial