This Note will discuss the procedural safeguards that must be provided when allegedly obscene materials are seized prior to distribution. The discussion will emphasize a consideration of the question whether the procedural requirements with respect to the seizure of printed materials are also applicable to the seizure of films, particularly those films that are being or are intended to be furtively distributed
This article examines the strict liability offence of the possession of objectionable publications i...
There was a time when accessing pornographic and obscene materials was much more difficult than it i...
There has been growing interest in the field of obscenity and its regulation, and these two comments...
This Note will discuss the procedural safeguards that must be provided when allegedly obscene materi...
This note re-examines government regulation of obscene material in the light of the first amendment ...
A Chicago municipal ordinance made it unlawful to exhibit any motion picture without first having se...
Near the end of the 1970-71 term, the Supreme Court considered two cases, United States v. Reidell a...
Sub clause (a) of Article 19 (1) of the constitution of India guarantees to every citizen of India t...
This report examines federal law regarding obscenity and indecency. The First Amendment provides: “C...
"Serial no. J-109-9."Shipping list no.: 2009-0079-P.Distributed to some depository libraries in micr...
This study is a six-chapter empirical survey of legal and societal proscription of obscenity in the ...
The New York Court of Appeals upheld the denial of a license to exhibit the French motion picture L...
Excelsior Picture Corporation v. Regents of University, 3 N.Y.2d 237, 165 N.Y.S.2d 42 (1957)
This note is concerned only with obscenity and pornography in written or pictorial form, that is, bo...
Includes bibliographical references.Heard by the Supreme Court in late 1965, Ginzburg v. United Stat...
This article examines the strict liability offence of the possession of objectionable publications i...
There was a time when accessing pornographic and obscene materials was much more difficult than it i...
There has been growing interest in the field of obscenity and its regulation, and these two comments...
This Note will discuss the procedural safeguards that must be provided when allegedly obscene materi...
This note re-examines government regulation of obscene material in the light of the first amendment ...
A Chicago municipal ordinance made it unlawful to exhibit any motion picture without first having se...
Near the end of the 1970-71 term, the Supreme Court considered two cases, United States v. Reidell a...
Sub clause (a) of Article 19 (1) of the constitution of India guarantees to every citizen of India t...
This report examines federal law regarding obscenity and indecency. The First Amendment provides: “C...
"Serial no. J-109-9."Shipping list no.: 2009-0079-P.Distributed to some depository libraries in micr...
This study is a six-chapter empirical survey of legal and societal proscription of obscenity in the ...
The New York Court of Appeals upheld the denial of a license to exhibit the French motion picture L...
Excelsior Picture Corporation v. Regents of University, 3 N.Y.2d 237, 165 N.Y.S.2d 42 (1957)
This note is concerned only with obscenity and pornography in written or pictorial form, that is, bo...
Includes bibliographical references.Heard by the Supreme Court in late 1965, Ginzburg v. United Stat...
This article examines the strict liability offence of the possession of objectionable publications i...
There was a time when accessing pornographic and obscene materials was much more difficult than it i...
There has been growing interest in the field of obscenity and its regulation, and these two comments...