Desarrollo y validación de la versión castellana de FINCODA: un instrumento de autoevaluación de la competencia de innovación de trabajadores o de candidatos a puestos de trabajo

[EN] This work will take the innovation transversal competence a skill to create, introduce, adapt and/or apply a beneficial novelty anywhere in an organization. We consider that innovation competences are a multidimensional construct that represents the skills required in all main process steps, from devising ideas, filtering, modeling and selecting them, to putting them into practice and comparing to see if they add value.In this research we aim to validate the long Spanish version (62 items) of the FINCODA innovation questionnaire (Andreu Andres et al., 2018; Marin-Garcia et al., 2016a) and to check if the medium-length version composition (34 items), that derive from a multi-cultural sample (Butter & van Beest, 2017), is stable with an independent sample of Spanish students. We will also propose a short version from the Soft Skills Scale (SSS17) (Marin-Garcia, 2019), based on single-items of all dimensions, which we will compare with other transversal competences by analyzing the relations among them. Data were obtained from self-perceptions (the evaluated person completes the questionnaire) with Likert/rating scales (Marin-Garcia et al., 2015) of innovation competence dimensions. This questionnaire is devised to be used for processes that select/evaluate the people who opt for a job post, regardless of them recently obtaining university degrees or being professionals.We examined the main published questionnaires used to measure the innovation competence. The validation of only a few has been published, while no validation has been published in Spanish. We also describe in detail the validation process that we will follow, the employed measuring instrument (by giving a detailed explanation of how the FINCODA questionnaire was built, and by specifying the measuring model and SSS17, F62 and F34 questionnaire items in their English and Spanish versions), the characteristics of the sample of 329 voluntary students, and the analysis procedure following SPSS and smartPLS.The results show how the measurement model of the long FINCODA questionnaire version presents content validity (relevance and comprehensiveness) and internal consistency (with analysis considering constructs to be either common factors or composites). Nonetheless, the discriminant validity of the constructs could not be demonstrated with the employed sample. Our analyses did not confirm the medium-length version put forward by other authors’ previous research. So, we will consider that versions F62 and F34 are pending to be analyzed with new independent samples, as is the proposal of the new F34 version obtained by more robust methods. The multidimensionality assumption of the innovation construct also needs revising. Having a short innovation scale with 10-15 items at the most is also recommendable. All this is considered future research in the present work.Este trabajo ha sido realizado con la financiación de la Unión Europea ["FINCODA" proyecto 554493-EPP1-2014-1-FI-EPPKA2-KA] (The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents Which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein).Marin-Garcia, JA. (2018). Development and validation of Spanish version of FINCODA: an instrument for self-assessment of innovation competence of workers or candidates for Jobs. Working Papers on Operations Management. 9(2):182-215. doi:10.4995/wpom.v9i2.1080018221592Abramis, D. J. (1994). Relationship of job stressors to job performance: Linear or an inverted-u? PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 75(1), 547-558.https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.75.1.547Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.American Management Association. (2012). Critical skills survey. https://www.amanet.org/training/articles/ama-2012-critical-skills-survey.aspx: American Management Association.Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128Andreu-Andrés, M. Á., Marin-García, J. A., & García-Carbonell, A. (2017). El barómetro incode como herramienta de autoevaluación de las competencias de innovación. REDU Revista de Educación Universitaria, 15(2), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2017.7746Andreu Andres, M. A., Garcia-Carbonell, A., González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F., & Watts, F. (2018). Contrasting innovation competence fincoda model in software engineering: Narrative review. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(4), 715-734. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2656Anzengruber, J., & Goetz, M. A. (2018). The cognitive and the action-oriented elements of competence along the innovation process - evidence from r&d teams in the medical equipment sector. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1424013Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Zhou, Q., & Hartnell, C. A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.631648Ato, M., & Vallejo, G. (2011). Los efectos de terceras variables en la investigación psicológica. Anales de Psicología, 27(2), 550-561.Azañedo, C. M., Fernandez-Abascal, E. G., & Barraca, J. (2017). The short form of the via inventory of strengths. Psicothema, 29(2), 254-260. doi:10.7334/psicothema2016.225Berdrow, I., & Evers, F. T. (2011). Bases of competence: A framework for facilitating reflective learner-centered educational environments. Journal of Management Education, 35(3), 406-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562909358976Burch, G. S. J., Pavelis, C., & Port, R. L. (2008). Selecting for creativity and innovation: The relationship between the innovation potential indicator and the team selection inventory. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(2), 177-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00422.xButter, R., & van Beest, W. (2017). Psychometric validation of a tool for innovation competencies development and assessment using a mixed-method design. Paper presented at the Internal research report of HU.Cerinsek, G., & Dolinsek, S. (2009). Identifying employees' innovation competency in organisations. Internation Journal of Innovation and Learning, 6(2), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2009.022811Chatenier, E. D., Verstegen, J. A. A. M., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Omta, O. S. W. F. (2010). Identification of competencies for professionals in open innovation teams. R and D Management, 40(3), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00590.xChoi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual dynamics of innovation-use behavior in organizations. Human Performance, 17(4), 397-414. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1704_3Conference Board of Canada. (2013). General innovation skills aptitude test (gisat 2.0). Retrieved from http://www.conferenceboard.ca/cbi/innovationskills.aspxDe Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2008). Innovative work behaviour: Meassurement and validaton (1467-8691).De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.xDoval Dieguez, E., & Viladrich Segués, M. C. (2011). Desarrollo y adaptación de cuestionarios en el ámbito de la salud. Bellaterra: Laboratori d'Estadística Aplicada i de Modelització (UAB).Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., & Christensen, C. M. (2009). The innovator's DNA. Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 60+-60+.Goffin, K., & Mitchell, R. (2010). Innovation management. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04752-6Gómez-Gasquet, P., Verdecho, M. J., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R., & Alfaro-Saiz, J. J. (2018). Formative assessment framework proposal for transversal competencies: Application to analysis and problem-solving competence. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(2), 334-340. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2504González Pernía, J. L., & Pe-a-Legazkue, I. (2007). Determinantes de la capacidad de innovación de los negocios emprendedores en espa-a. Economia Industrial(363), 129-147.Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem). 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90-115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556Henseler, J. (2017). User manual adanco 2.0.1 (1st ed.). Kleve: Composite Modeling GmbH & Co.Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016a). Using pls path modeling in new technology research : Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016b). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304Hoai Nam, T., Phong Tuan, N., & Van Minh, N. (2017). Critical successful factors for innovation in vietnamese firms. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 10(3), 522-544. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2020Hülsmann, M., Tilebein, M., Cordes, P., & Stolarski, V. (2017). Cognitive diversity of top management teams as a competence-based driver of innovation capability Strategy and communication for innovation: Integrative perspectives on innovation in the digital economy (pp. 77-88)Isaksson, K. (2007). Psychological contracts across employment situations (psycones). Brussels. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/documents/documentlibrary/100123961EN6.pdf: European Commission.Jabri, M. (1991). The development of conceptually independent subscales in the measurement of modes of problem solving. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 31, 783-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316449105100417Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology(73), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038Jarvis, C.-B., MacKenzie, S.-B., & Podsakoff, P.-M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1086/376806Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big five personality traits as the predictors of creative self‐efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(3), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.32Keinänen, M., & Oksanen, A. (2017). Students' perception of learning innovation competences in activity-based learning environment. Ammattikasvatuksen aikakauskirja, 19(4), 48-61.Keinänen, M., Ursin, J., & Nissinen, K. (2018). How to measure students' innovation competences in higher education: Evaluation of an assessment tool in authentic learning environments. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.007Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622-629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660Klippel, A. F., Petter, C. O., & Antunes, J. (2008). Management innovation, a way for mining companies to survive in a globalized world. Paper presented at the Utilities Policy European Regulatory Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2007.09.001Lehto, A., Kairisto-Mertanene, L., & Penttilä, T. (2011). Towards innovation pedagogy. A new approach to teaching and learning for universities of applied sciences. Turku: Turku University of Apllied Sciences.Losilla, J. M., Navarro, J. B., Palmer, A., Rodrigo, M. F., & Ato, M. (2005). Análisis de datos. Del contraste de hipótesis al modelado estadístico. Barcelona: Edicions a Petició.Luke, R. (2013). Measuring innovation skills acquired by college and polytechnic students through applied research. Technology Innovation Management Review(October), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/735Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2019). Development and validation of spanish version of soft skills scale (sss17sp). WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 10(in press).Marin-Garcia, J. A., Alfalla-Luque, R., & Machuca, J. A. D. (2018). A triple-a supply chain measurement model: Validation and analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(10), 976-994. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-06-2018-0233Marin-Garcia, J. A., Andreu Andres, M. A., Atares-Huerta, L., Aznar-Mas, L. E., Garcia-Carbonell, A., González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F., Watts, F. (2016a). Propossal of framework for innovation competencies development and assessment (fincoda). WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 7(2), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v7i2.6472Marin-Garcia, J. A., Atares-Huerta, L., & Aznar-Mas, L. E. (2017). ¿cuántas competencias transversales podemos diferenciar en un auto-diagnóstico? Paper presented at the IN-RED Congreso Nacional de Innovación Educativa y de Docencia en Red, UPV. Valencia, 13 y 14 de junio 2017.Marin-Garcia, J. A., Aznar-Mas, L. E., & González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F. (2011). Innovation types and talent managment for innovation. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 2(2), 25-31.https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v2i2.926Marin-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Sabater, J. P., Perello-Marin, M. R., & Canos-Daros, L. (2009). Proposal of skills for the bachelor degree of industrial engineering in the context of the new curriculum. Intangible Capital, 5(4), 387-406. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.2009.v5n4.p387-406Marin-Garcia, J. A., González, E., Carrasco, M., & Ros, D. (2016b). Action planning intervention to identify how to improve selection processes for internships. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 7(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v7i2.6549Marin-Garcia, J. A., Perez-Pe-alver, M. J., & Watts, F. (2013). How to assess innovation competence in services: The case of university students. Direccion y Organizacion(50), 48-62.Marin-Garcia, J. A., Ramirez Bayarri, L., & Atares-Huerta, L. (2015). Protocol: Comparing advantages and disadvantages of rating scales, behavior observation scales and paired comparison scales for behavior assessment of competencies in workers. A systematic literature review. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 2(6), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v6i2.4032Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model : The influence of perceived user resources. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 86-112. https://doi.org/10.1145/506724.506730Matthews, R. A., Diaz, W. M., & Cole, S. G. (2003). The organizational empowerment scale. Personnel Review, 32(3), 297-318. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480310467624Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). Cosmin methodology for systematic reviews of patient‐reported outcome measures (proms). User manual. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Public Health research instituteMokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., . . . De Vet, H. C. (2010). The cosmin checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC medical research methodology, 10(1), 22.https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-22Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., . . . De Vet, H. C. (2012). The cosmin checklist manual.Morente, F., & Ferràs, X. (2017). Innovation management from the inside: An approach from attention and everyday praxis. Intangible Capital, 13(3), 640-667. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.1004.https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.1004Munro, D., & Watt, D. (2014). Skills for business innovation success: It's people who innovate: Conference Board of Canada,Ozkaya, A. (2010). R&d teams competencies, innovation, and growth with knowledge information flow. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(3), 416-429. doi:10.1109/TEM.2009.2037737https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2009.2037737Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004Patterson, F. (1999). The innovation potential indicator. Manual and user's guide. Oxford: OPP Ltd.Patterson, F., Kerrin, M., & Gatto-Roissard, G. (2009). Characteristics & behaviours of innovative people in organisations. City University, London: NESTA Policy and Research Unit (NPRU).Pérez Pe-alver, M. J., Aznar Mas, L. E., & Montero Fleta, B. (2018). Identification and classification of behavioural indicators to assess innovation competence. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2552Prieto, M. I., & Pérez-Santana, M. P. (2014). Managing innovative work behavior: The role of human resource practices. Personnel Review, 43(2), 184-208. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2012-0199Prinsen, C. A. C., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., de Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). Cosmin guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1147-1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3Prinsen, C. A. C., Vohra, S., Rose, M. R., Boers, M., Tugwell, P., Clarke, M., . . . Terwee, C. B. (2016). How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "core outcome set" - a practical guideline. Trials, 17(1), 449. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2Ramirez Bayarri, L., Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Atares-Huerta, L. (2016). How has been assessed the innovation competency in companies and universities? WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 7(2), 140-167. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v7i2.6886Richter, N. F., Cepeda, G., Roldán, J. L., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem). European Management Journal, 34(6), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.001Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. (2012). A critical look at the use of pls-sem in mis quarterly. Mis Quarterly, 36(1), ii-xiv. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410402Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). Smartpls 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Available at http://www.smartpls.comSaiz, L., Pérez-Miguel, D., & Manzanedo-del Campo, M. Á. (2018). The knowledge absorptive capacity to improve the cooperation and innovation in the firm. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(2), 290-307. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2505Sanchez, L., Blanco, B., & Marín-García, J. A. (2017). Protocol: Validation of the incode barometer to measure the innovation competence through the rasch measurement theory. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 8(Special Issue), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7190Santos, G. J. (2006). Card sort technique as a qualitative substitute for quantitative exploratory factor analysis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(3), 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280610680867Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with pls and cbsem: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998-4010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students, 7/e. Essex: Pearson Education.Schepers, P., & van den Berg, P. T. (2007). Social factors of work-environment creativity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-006-9035-4Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management Journal, 37(3), 580--607.Spiegelaere, S. D., & Gyes, G. V. (2012). Innovative work behavior: Concept & measurement. ISPIM Conference Proceedings, 1-1.Sternberg, R. J., & Matthew, C. T. (2006). Leading innovation through collaboration. In M. M. Beyerlein, S. T. Beyerlein, & F. A. Kennedy (Eds.), Innovation through collaboration (advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams, volume 12) (pp. 27-52): Emerald Group Publishing LimitedSung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2009). Do big five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 37(7), 941-956. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.7.941ter Haar, P. (2018). Measuring innovation: A state of the science review of existing approaches. Intangible Capital, 14(3), 409-428. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.1254Terwee, C., Jansma, E., Riphagen, I., & de Vet, H. W. (2009). Development of a methodological pubmed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 1115-1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5Upasna, A. A., Sumita, D., Stacy, B. B., & Shivganesh, B. (2012). Linking lmx, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Caree