A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services

© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)Collaborative management is a new framework to help implement programmes in protected areas. Within this context, the aim of this work is twofold. First, to propose a robust methodology to implement collaborative management focused on ecosystem services. Second, to develop indicators for the main functions of ecosystem services. Decision makers, technical staff and other stakeholders are included in the process from the beginning, by identifying ecosystem services and eliciting preferences using the AHP method. Qualitative and quantitative data are then integrated into a PROMETHEE based method in order to obtain indicators for provisioning, maintenance and direct to citizens services. This methodology, which has been applied in a forest area, provides a tool for exploiting available technical and social data in a continuous process, as well as providing easy to understand graphical results. This approach also overcomes the difficulties found in prioritizing management objectives in a multiple criteria context with limited resources and facilitates consensus between all of the people involved. The new indicators define an innovative approach to assessing the ecosystem services from the supply perspective and provide basic information to help establish payment systems for environmental services and compensation for natural disasters.The authors acknowledge the support received from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the research project Ref. ECO2011-27369, as well as the time and expert judgments from all the decision makers, technical staff, other stakeholders and citizens involved in the surveys we have carried out. A special mention to the director and technical staff of the Serra d'Espada Natural Park for all support and collaboration with this research. Marina Segura also thanks the Ministry of Education for support through the scholarship of Training Plan of University Teaching for developing her doctoral thesis. We also thank the reviewers for their suggestions to improve the paper.Segura Maroto, M.; Maroto Álvarez, MC.; Belton, V.; Ginestar Peiro, CM. (2015). A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services. Forests. 6(5):1696-1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/f60516961696172065Fitzsimons, J., Pearson, C. J., Lawson, C., & Hill, M. J. (2012). Evaluation of land-use planning in greenbelts based on intrinsic characteristics and stakeholder values. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(1), 23-34. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.012Kijazi, M. H., & Kant, S. (2011). Social acceptability of alternative forest regimes in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, using stakeholder attitudes as metrics of uncertainty. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(4), 242-257. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.12.001Mustajoki, J., Saarikoski, H., Marttunen, M., Ahtikoski, A., Hallikainen, V., Helle, T., … Ylisirniö, A.-L. (2011). Use of decision analysis interviews to support the sustainable use of the forests in Finnish Upper Lapland. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(6), 1550-1563. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.007Palacios-Agundez, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Madariaga, I., & Onaindia, M. (2013). The Relevance of Local Participatory Scenario Planning for Ecosystem Management Policies in the Basque Country, Northern Spain. Ecology and Society, 18(3). doi:10.5751/es-05619-180307Tompkins, E. L., Few, R., & Brown, K. (2008). Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: Incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 1580-1592. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.025Apostolopoulou, E., Drakou, E. G., & Pediaditi, K. (2012). Participation in the management of Greek Natura 2000 sites: Evidence from a cross-level analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 308-318. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.006Liu, J., Ouyang, Z., & Miao, H. (2010). Environmental attitudes of stakeholders and their perceptions regarding protected area-community conflicts: A case study in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(11), 2254-2262. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.007Rees, S. E., Attrill, M. J., Austen, M. C., Mangi, S. C., & Rodwell, L. D. (2013). A thematic cost-benefit analysis of a marine protected area. Journal of Environmental Management, 114, 476-485. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.048Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014Mendoza, G. A., & Martins, H. (2006). Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management, 230(1-3), 1-22. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023De Brucker, K., Macharis, C., & Verbeke, A. (2013). Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: A stakeholder management approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(1), 122-131. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.021Petrokofsky, G., Brown, N. D., Hemery, G. E., Woodward, S., Wilson, E., Weatherall, A., … Arnold, J. E. M. (2010). A participatory process for identifying and prioritizing policy-relevant research questions in natural resource management: a case study from the UK forestry sector. Forestry, 83(4), 357-367. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpq018Maroto Álvarez, C., Segura, M., Ginestar, C., Uriol, J., & Segura, B. (2013). Sustainable Forest Management in a Mediterranean region: Social preferences. Forest Systems, 22(3), 546. doi:10.5424/fs/2013223-04135Segura, M., Ray, D., & Maroto, C. (2014). Decision support systems for forest management: A comparative analysis and assessment. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 101, 55-67. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2013.12.005Martinez-Harms, M. J., Bryan, B. A., Balvanera, P., Law, E. A., Rhodes, J. R., Possingham, H. P., & Wilson, K. A. (2015). Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 184, 229-238. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024Sijtsma, F. J., van der Heide, C. M., & van Hinsberg, A. (2013). Beyond monetary measurement: How to evaluate projects and policies using the ecosystem services framework. Environmental Science & Policy, 32, 14-25. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.016Macharis, C., Springael, J., De Brucker, K., & Verbeke, A. (2004). PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 307-317. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00153-xFontana, V., Radtke, A., Bossi Fedrigotti, V., Tappeiner, U., Tasser, E., Zerbe, S., & Buchholz, T. (2013). Comparing land-use alternatives: Using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Economics, 93, 128-136. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.007Turcksin, L., Bernardini, A., & Macharis, C. (2011). A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 954-965. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104Macharis, C., Turcksin, L., & Lebeau, K. (2012). Multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: State of use. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 610-620. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.008Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198-215. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of The Total Environment, 409(19), 3578-3594. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2009). A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2535-2548. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.010Vacik, H., Kurttila, M., Hujala, T., Khadka, C., Haara, A., Pykäläinen, J., … Tikkanen, J. (2014). Evaluating collaborative planning methods supporting programme-based planning in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 144, 304-315. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.029Fisher, B., & Kerry Turner, R. (2008). Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation. Biological Conservation, 141(5), 1167-1169. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.019Corner, J., Buchanan, J., & Henig, M. (2001). Dynamic decision problem structuring. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10(3), 129-141. doi:10.1002/mcda.295Marques-Perez, I., Segura, B., & Maroto, C. (2014). Evaluating the functionality of agricultural systems: social preferences for multifunctional peri-urban agriculture. The «Huerta de Valencia» as case study. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(4), 889. doi:10.5424/sjar/2014124-6061Xu, Z. (2000). On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 126(3), 683-687. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00082-xBanville, C., Landry, M., Martel, J.-M., & Boulaire, C. (1998). A stakeholder approach to MCDA. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 15(1), 15-32. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1743(199801/02)15:13.0.co;2-bHarrison, S. R., & Qureshi, M. E. (2000). Choice of stakeholder groups and members in multicriteria decision models. Natural Resources Forum, 24(1), 11-19. doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2000.tb00925.xScholten, L., Scheidegger, A., Reichert, P., Mauer, M., & Lienert, J. (2014). Strategic rehabilitation planning of piped water networks using multi-criteria decision analysis. Water Research, 49, 124-143. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.017Miller, K. A., & Belton, V. (2014). Water resource management and climate change adaptation: a holistic and multiple criteria perspective. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 19(3), 289-308. doi:10.1007/s11027-013-9537-0The OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/Parcs Naturals de la Comunitat Valenciana http://www.cma.gva.es/webdoc/documento.ashx?id=141553The List of Wetlands of International Importance http://www.ramsar.orgDe Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. . (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393-408. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00089-7Costanza, R., d’ Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., … van den Belt, M. (1998). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 25(1), 3-15. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(98)00020-2Plan de Acción Territorial Forestal de la Comunitat Valenciana http://www.cma.gva.es/webdoc/documento.ashx?id=144302Tofallis, C. (2014). Add or Multiply? A Tutorial on Ranking and Choosing with Multiple Criteria. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 14(3), 109-119. doi:10.1287/ited.2013.0124Valls-Donderis, P., Vallés, M. C., & Galiana, F. (2015). Criteria and indicators for sustainable forestry under Mediterranean conditions applicable in Spain at the forest management unit scale. Forest Systems, 24(1), 004. doi:10.5424/fs/2015241-05542Ananda, J. (2007). Implementing Participatory Decision Making in Forest Planning. Environmental Management, 39(4), 534-544. doi:10.1007/s00267-006-0031-2Mendelsohn, R., & Olmstead, S. (2009). The Economic Valuation of Environmental Amenities and Disamenities: Methods and Applications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 325-347. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-011509-135201Wilson, M. A., & Hoehn, J. P. (2006). Valuing environmental goods and services using benefit transfer: The state-of-the art and science. Ecological Economics, 60(2), 335-342. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.01