The ‘rephrase’ relation between propositions is introduced in Inference Anchoring Theory to facilitate argument mining (the automated analysis of argumentative discourse). Examining an example from the candidates’ debates leading up to the 2016 presidential elections in the United States, we explore the relation between such rephrases and the straw man fallacy. Our aim with the structural characterisation of the fallacy is to work towards a foundation for the automated identiϐication of rephrase and inference patterns as a tool in computationally identifying instances of straw man and similar fallacies (e.g. ignoratio elenchi)
The goal of this paper is to critically analyze some of the dubious assumptions about language and m...
In this paper, we investigate whether participants perceive the disagreement between interlocutors w...
While the role of discourse connectives has long been acknowledged in argumentative frameworks, the...
The ‘rephrase’ relation between propositions is introduced in Inference Anchoring Theory to facilita...
This chapter deals with one of the common fallacies in Western philosophy called “Straw Man”. How on...
In this paper, an analysis is given of the straw man fallacy as a misrepresentation of someone'...
This book shows how research in linguistic pragmatics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric can be c...
This paper presents an experimental investigation of the effectiveness of the straw man fallacy, whi...
The straw man fallacy consists in inappropriately constructing or selecting weak (or comparatively w...
Political discourse often seems divided not just by different preferences, but by entirely different...
A straw man is a form of fallacious argument that involves the distortion of an opponent’s view in o...
International audienceFallacies play a prominent role in argumentation since antiquity due to their ...
The straw man fallacy consists in inappropriately constructing or selecting weak (or comparatively w...
This paper builds a nine-step method for determining whether a straw man fallacy has been committed ...
Presidential debates are significant moments in the history of presidential campaigns. In these deba...
The goal of this paper is to critically analyze some of the dubious assumptions about language and m...
In this paper, we investigate whether participants perceive the disagreement between interlocutors w...
While the role of discourse connectives has long been acknowledged in argumentative frameworks, the...
The ‘rephrase’ relation between propositions is introduced in Inference Anchoring Theory to facilita...
This chapter deals with one of the common fallacies in Western philosophy called “Straw Man”. How on...
In this paper, an analysis is given of the straw man fallacy as a misrepresentation of someone'...
This book shows how research in linguistic pragmatics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric can be c...
This paper presents an experimental investigation of the effectiveness of the straw man fallacy, whi...
The straw man fallacy consists in inappropriately constructing or selecting weak (or comparatively w...
Political discourse often seems divided not just by different preferences, but by entirely different...
A straw man is a form of fallacious argument that involves the distortion of an opponent’s view in o...
International audienceFallacies play a prominent role in argumentation since antiquity due to their ...
The straw man fallacy consists in inappropriately constructing or selecting weak (or comparatively w...
This paper builds a nine-step method for determining whether a straw man fallacy has been committed ...
Presidential debates are significant moments in the history of presidential campaigns. In these deba...
The goal of this paper is to critically analyze some of the dubious assumptions about language and m...
In this paper, we investigate whether participants perceive the disagreement between interlocutors w...
While the role of discourse connectives has long been acknowledged in argumentative frameworks, the...