In `Freedom and Resentment,' Strawson argues that we cannot separate holding people morally responsible for their actions from specific emotional responses, which he calls reactive attitudes, which we are disposed towards in response to people's actions. Strawson's view might pose problems for forgiveness, in which we choose to overcome reactive attitudes like resentment without altering the judgments that make them appropriate. I present a detailed analysis of reactive attitudes, which I use both to defend Strawson's account of the connection between these states and responsibility, and to show how we can fit forgiveness into this account
According to the dominant account of forgiveness, to forgive is to overcome the reactive attitudes w...
A discussion of the scope that exists for the normative assessment of blame. The paper starts from t...
My dissertation develops a novel response to global skepticism about responsibility—the view that no...
© 2016 by Tijdschrift voor Filosofie. All rights reserved. Peter Strawson makes a crucial distinctio...
In Strawson’s “Freedom and Resentment”, the idea of the reactive attitudes is used to provide a corr...
SFRH/BPD/77687/2011 UID/FIL/00183/2013In “Freedom and Resentment” P.F. Strawson distinguishes betwee...
This paper argues for a new understanding of Strawson’s distinction between personal, impersonal, an...
The attitudes P. F. Strawson dubs reactive are felt toward another (or oneself). They are thus at le...
I defend resentment as a legitimate and necessary moral attitude by neutralizing an objection that p...
The debate surrounding the issue of collective moral responsibility is often steeped in metaphysical...
Forgiveness is traditionally understood as a personal change of heart, in which an individual victim...
Philosophers discussing forgiveness have usually been split between those who think that forgiveness...
In this thesis, I argue that P.F. Strawson seriously underestimates the controversial nature of the...
According to Peter Strawson’s reactive attitudes approach toward moral responsibility, reactive atti...
What do our reactive attitudes towards perceived moral infractions truly represent? According to Gar...
According to the dominant account of forgiveness, to forgive is to overcome the reactive attitudes w...
A discussion of the scope that exists for the normative assessment of blame. The paper starts from t...
My dissertation develops a novel response to global skepticism about responsibility—the view that no...
© 2016 by Tijdschrift voor Filosofie. All rights reserved. Peter Strawson makes a crucial distinctio...
In Strawson’s “Freedom and Resentment”, the idea of the reactive attitudes is used to provide a corr...
SFRH/BPD/77687/2011 UID/FIL/00183/2013In “Freedom and Resentment” P.F. Strawson distinguishes betwee...
This paper argues for a new understanding of Strawson’s distinction between personal, impersonal, an...
The attitudes P. F. Strawson dubs reactive are felt toward another (or oneself). They are thus at le...
I defend resentment as a legitimate and necessary moral attitude by neutralizing an objection that p...
The debate surrounding the issue of collective moral responsibility is often steeped in metaphysical...
Forgiveness is traditionally understood as a personal change of heart, in which an individual victim...
Philosophers discussing forgiveness have usually been split between those who think that forgiveness...
In this thesis, I argue that P.F. Strawson seriously underestimates the controversial nature of the...
According to Peter Strawson’s reactive attitudes approach toward moral responsibility, reactive atti...
What do our reactive attitudes towards perceived moral infractions truly represent? According to Gar...
According to the dominant account of forgiveness, to forgive is to overcome the reactive attitudes w...
A discussion of the scope that exists for the normative assessment of blame. The paper starts from t...
My dissertation develops a novel response to global skepticism about responsibility—the view that no...