Research outputs are growing in number and frequency, assisted by a greater number of publication mediums and platforms via which material can be disseminated. At the same time, the requirement to find acceptable, timely, objective measurements of research "quality" has become more important. Historically, citations have been used as an independent indication of the significance of scholarly material. However, citations are very slow to accrue since they can only be made by subsequently published material. This enforces a delay of a number of years before the citation impact of a publication can be accurately judged. By contrast, each new citation establishes a large number of co-citation relationships between that publication and older mat...
This work presents a new approach for analysing the ability of existing research metrics to identify...
The measurement of scholarly output is critically important to the world of academia, especially wit...
In this paper we show that citation counts and Mendeley readership are poor indicators of research e...
Scholarly outputs are growing in number and frequency, driving the requirement to research new early...
The unprecedented challenges of “information overload” in the digital age have prompted academic ins...
The citations count is flawed but it still the most common way of measuring the academic impact used...
The degree to which a scholar’s work is cited by others has been regarded as an indicator of its sci...
Publication metrics indicate the visibility and reach of a research publication. The metrics can be ...
Citation metrics are statistical measures of scientific outputs that draw on citation indexes. They ...
Chapter One from the book, The New Metrics: Practical Assessment of Research Impact Provides an intr...
The “citation score” remains the most commonly-used measure of academic impact, but is also viewed a...
Scientific research is a competitive business – in order to secure funding, promotion and tenure res...
Quantifying scholarly output via traditional citation metrics is the time-honored method to gauge ac...
How does scientific research affect the world around us? Being able to answer this question is of gr...
How does scientific research affect the world around us? Being able to answer this question is of gr...
This work presents a new approach for analysing the ability of existing research metrics to identify...
The measurement of scholarly output is critically important to the world of academia, especially wit...
In this paper we show that citation counts and Mendeley readership are poor indicators of research e...
Scholarly outputs are growing in number and frequency, driving the requirement to research new early...
The unprecedented challenges of “information overload” in the digital age have prompted academic ins...
The citations count is flawed but it still the most common way of measuring the academic impact used...
The degree to which a scholar’s work is cited by others has been regarded as an indicator of its sci...
Publication metrics indicate the visibility and reach of a research publication. The metrics can be ...
Citation metrics are statistical measures of scientific outputs that draw on citation indexes. They ...
Chapter One from the book, The New Metrics: Practical Assessment of Research Impact Provides an intr...
The “citation score” remains the most commonly-used measure of academic impact, but is also viewed a...
Scientific research is a competitive business – in order to secure funding, promotion and tenure res...
Quantifying scholarly output via traditional citation metrics is the time-honored method to gauge ac...
How does scientific research affect the world around us? Being able to answer this question is of gr...
How does scientific research affect the world around us? Being able to answer this question is of gr...
This work presents a new approach for analysing the ability of existing research metrics to identify...
The measurement of scholarly output is critically important to the world of academia, especially wit...
In this paper we show that citation counts and Mendeley readership are poor indicators of research e...