It is an old saw that prosecutors have both an ethical and a legal obligation to do justice. The contours of that obligation, however, are not well defined. This Article addresses one particularly neglected aspect of the obligation: prosecutors\u27 ethical duty to serve justice after convictions are complete. Prosecutorial justice issues seem to arise less frequently after conviction than at trial. Prosecutorial discretion is at its height in the postconviction context because legislators and professional code drafters have not focused on postconviction issues. Freed from binding legal constraints, prosecutors have avoided deep consideration of how their general obligation to serve justice might apply. Once defendants have been found guil...
Procedure is a mechanism for expressing political and social relationships and is a device for produ...
Tasked with enforcing the criminal law against suspected offenders, public prosecutors have traditio...
Petitioner asks this Court to interpret Fed. R. Evid. 606(b) as permitting statements made by jurors...
This Article explores the possible role of the attorney disciplinary process in discouraging prosecu...
Prior research has demonstrated that the relationship between defendant characteristics and prosecut...
This Article advocates two changes to the law. First, parties should be allowed (but not required) t...
To what extent should federal prosecutors be regulated by states, by federal courts, or by the U.S. ...
There are powerful historical, constitutional, empirical, and policy justifications for a return to ...
This paper examines the criminal prosecution of Milberg Weiss, formerly the most successful plaintif...
A law office search threatens the attorney-client relationship by jeopardizing values protected by t...
The decision as to who has the authority to bring a matter up for resolution before a criminal court...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
This Article asks two basic questions: When does, and when should, the state use the criminal justic...
Unlike virtually any other business, expert witnesses are not typically held accountable in either t...
This article considers many commonly advanced criticisms of the adversary system. It provides an an...
Procedure is a mechanism for expressing political and social relationships and is a device for produ...
Tasked with enforcing the criminal law against suspected offenders, public prosecutors have traditio...
Petitioner asks this Court to interpret Fed. R. Evid. 606(b) as permitting statements made by jurors...
This Article explores the possible role of the attorney disciplinary process in discouraging prosecu...
Prior research has demonstrated that the relationship between defendant characteristics and prosecut...
This Article advocates two changes to the law. First, parties should be allowed (but not required) t...
To what extent should federal prosecutors be regulated by states, by federal courts, or by the U.S. ...
There are powerful historical, constitutional, empirical, and policy justifications for a return to ...
This paper examines the criminal prosecution of Milberg Weiss, formerly the most successful plaintif...
A law office search threatens the attorney-client relationship by jeopardizing values protected by t...
The decision as to who has the authority to bring a matter up for resolution before a criminal court...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
This Article asks two basic questions: When does, and when should, the state use the criminal justic...
Unlike virtually any other business, expert witnesses are not typically held accountable in either t...
This article considers many commonly advanced criticisms of the adversary system. It provides an an...
Procedure is a mechanism for expressing political and social relationships and is a device for produ...
Tasked with enforcing the criminal law against suspected offenders, public prosecutors have traditio...
Petitioner asks this Court to interpret Fed. R. Evid. 606(b) as permitting statements made by jurors...