Involving fishermen in seabirds’ conservation: bridging the gap between socio-economic needs of industry and the needs of seabirds

Marine ecosystems and species face multiple threats, particularly intensive industrial-scale fishing activities. As the human population continues to increase exponentially and drive a greater demand for food, commercial fishing effort will likely intensify. While terrestrial protected areas are well developed, marine protected areas (MPAs) are less so, both in the area covered and management practices. There is currently a drive to increase the extent of MPAs, both globally and in South Africa, particularly for those ecosystems and marine species that can benefit from area-based management. The size, shape, location zonation of MPAs generally remain static through time. However, the ocean is a dynamic environment and static MPAs are not always able to achieve conservation objectives for their component ecosystems and species. Dynamic Ocean Management (DOM) is an approach that integrates near real-time data on biological, oceanographic, social and/or economic variables to adjust an MPAs boundary and zonation in both space and time. The aim of this thesis was to assess the viability of applying DOM to a fishing exclusion zone within a zoned MPA in Algoa Bay, South Africa, to support conservation objectives for the Endangered African penguin Spheniscus demersus. Algoa Bay supports half of the world’s remaining population of this species. First, the degree of spatial overlap between foraging penguins and purse-seine fishers in Algoa Bay was determined over five years. In all years, purse-seiner fishing vessels were located around or near to St Croix Island and a large proportion of the total pelagic fish catch from the Bay was removed from this area. Breeding penguins travelled significantly further while foraging when the overlap (and subsequent competition for pelagic fish) was higher, suggesting that African penguins would benefit from a fishing exclusion zone around St Croix Island owing to reduced competition. However, an exclusion zone can have socio-economic impacts on fisheries as a result of the lost fishing area. A common concern raised by fishers is the direct loss of income, either as a result of increased fuel costs to reach alternate fishing grounds or decreased catch. An analysis of catch and travel time (as a proxy for fuel costs) when a 20 km exclusion zone was present or absent around St Croix Island revealed that the exclusion zone scenarios had no significant impact on either variable. Interviews with individuals in the local purse-seine fishery (both fishers and factory managers) showed a consensus that the marine environment needs protection and that MPAs have various environmental benefits. Despite this, individuals were concerned about how they would be impacted by the exclusion zone in the MPA. The interviews highlighted the willingness of individuals in the purse-seine fishery to talk to and work with scientists