Add to ORKGThe authors examine the way in which political ideology appears to have influenced the decisions of recent administrations regarding antitrust merger enforcement and argue that political ideology should play, at most, a limited and carefully circumscribed role in merger law enforcement
Democratic and Republican administrations and the Supreme Court, in implementing antitrust law as “a...
This paper empirically models the longer-run deep-seated shift in intellectual thinking that followe...
Does recent federal merger regulation make economic sense? Merger activity has clearly increased thi...
The authors examine the way in which political ideology appears to have influenced the decisions of ...
This article, which was prepared for an ABA Antitrust Section Panel, discusses the role of ideology ...
Antitrust regulators play a critical role in protecting market competition. We examine whether the p...
With the growth of the administrative state, agency-promulgated enforcement policy statements, typic...
This Article makes two primary contributions to the antitrust literature. First, it identifies the d...
Mergers and acquisitions can involve a significant review by antitrust authorities; however, neither...
Recent antitrust convictions have brought public attention to bear on this aspect of the business wo...
Antitrust regulators play a critical role in protecting market competition. We examine whether the p...
This article examines a vital problem of private antitrust enforcement - the standing of private mer...
Economic policy determines the intensity of competition in markets. This gives incumbents the incent...
This paper looks at the political economy of merger policy under autarky and in international market...
Antitrust law stands at its most fluid and negotiable moment in a generation. The bipartisan consens...
Democratic and Republican administrations and the Supreme Court, in implementing antitrust law as “a...
This paper empirically models the longer-run deep-seated shift in intellectual thinking that followe...
Does recent federal merger regulation make economic sense? Merger activity has clearly increased thi...
The authors examine the way in which political ideology appears to have influenced the decisions of ...
This article, which was prepared for an ABA Antitrust Section Panel, discusses the role of ideology ...
Antitrust regulators play a critical role in protecting market competition. We examine whether the p...
With the growth of the administrative state, agency-promulgated enforcement policy statements, typic...
This Article makes two primary contributions to the antitrust literature. First, it identifies the d...
Mergers and acquisitions can involve a significant review by antitrust authorities; however, neither...
Recent antitrust convictions have brought public attention to bear on this aspect of the business wo...
Antitrust regulators play a critical role in protecting market competition. We examine whether the p...
This article examines a vital problem of private antitrust enforcement - the standing of private mer...
Economic policy determines the intensity of competition in markets. This gives incumbents the incent...
This paper looks at the political economy of merger policy under autarky and in international market...
Antitrust law stands at its most fluid and negotiable moment in a generation. The bipartisan consens...
Democratic and Republican administrations and the Supreme Court, in implementing antitrust law as “a...
This paper empirically models the longer-run deep-seated shift in intellectual thinking that followe...
Does recent federal merger regulation make economic sense? Merger activity has clearly increased thi...