Leading explanations of judicial independence argue political competition incentivizes those in power to create independent courts as insurance against uncertain futures. While much work addresses the role competition plays, little analyzes the fundamental assumption that courts provide political insurance. I offer an original hypothesis as to how independent courts provide insurance against post-tenure punishment and test this using data on post-tenure fate of leaders from 1960-2004. Results show independence is associated with significantly higher probabilities of unpunished posttenure fate. The article builds on and extend existing political insurance explanations, and offers the first test of one of their critical assumptions
Separation-of-powers models of judicial decision making traditionally focus on the U.S. Supreme Cour...
One of the most prominent explanations of the creation and maintenance of independent judiciary is t...
The conventional wisdom among many legal scholars is that judicial independence can best be achieved...
Scholars who examine judicial independence offer various theories regarding its development. Some ar...
tWe use data about the Italian Constitutional Court (1956–2006) to verify an implication of the “rev...
This book argues that explaining judicial independence-considered the fundamental question of compar...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2012This dissertation examines the relationship between po...
In this study I provide an empirical analysis of the judicial system. The main emphasis of this stud...
One of the most prominent explanations of the creation and maintenance of independent judiciary is t...
This article reconsiders how to judge judicial independence by using the Japanese judicature, one of...
Judicial independence is critical to enforcement of separation of powers, effective protection of pr...
Why do societies choose particular institutions of judicial selection and retention? Why do they for...
We test the efficacy of judicial independence in preventing regime reversals toward authoritarianism...
According to the so-called Insurance Theory of judicial empowerment, incumbent elites create indepen...
In pursuing their goals, members of the U.S. Supreme Court are affected by their institutional setti...
Separation-of-powers models of judicial decision making traditionally focus on the U.S. Supreme Cour...
One of the most prominent explanations of the creation and maintenance of independent judiciary is t...
The conventional wisdom among many legal scholars is that judicial independence can best be achieved...
Scholars who examine judicial independence offer various theories regarding its development. Some ar...
tWe use data about the Italian Constitutional Court (1956–2006) to verify an implication of the “rev...
This book argues that explaining judicial independence-considered the fundamental question of compar...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2012This dissertation examines the relationship between po...
In this study I provide an empirical analysis of the judicial system. The main emphasis of this stud...
One of the most prominent explanations of the creation and maintenance of independent judiciary is t...
This article reconsiders how to judge judicial independence by using the Japanese judicature, one of...
Judicial independence is critical to enforcement of separation of powers, effective protection of pr...
Why do societies choose particular institutions of judicial selection and retention? Why do they for...
We test the efficacy of judicial independence in preventing regime reversals toward authoritarianism...
According to the so-called Insurance Theory of judicial empowerment, incumbent elites create indepen...
In pursuing their goals, members of the U.S. Supreme Court are affected by their institutional setti...
Separation-of-powers models of judicial decision making traditionally focus on the U.S. Supreme Cour...
One of the most prominent explanations of the creation and maintenance of independent judiciary is t...
The conventional wisdom among many legal scholars is that judicial independence can best be achieved...