Replication data for: Does the Diversionary Use of Force Threaten the Democratic Peace? Assessing the Effect of Economic Growth on Interstate Conflict, 1921- 2001

A democratic leader, anticipating a ‘‘rally ‘round the flag effect,’’ may have an incentive to divert attention from domestic economic problems by becoming involved in military conflict abroad, undermining Immanuel Kant’s prescription for ‘‘perpetual peace.’’ We assess the risk to the democratic peace by evaluating this diversionary incentive within a general dyadic model of interstate conflict, 1921–2001, using both directed and nondirected analyses. Our results indicate that economic conditions do affect the likelihood that a democracy, but not an autocracy, will initiate a fatal militarized dispute, even against another democracy. Economic growth rates sufficiently low to negate the democratic peace are, however, rare; and the behavior of five powerful democracies raises further doubts about the importance of diversions. We find no significant evidence that a bad economy makes a democratic state less likely to be targeted by others, nor does the timing of legislative elections influence the decision of democratic leaders to use force. Alth ough economic conditions affect the likelihood of a fatal dispute for democracies, the influence is sufficiently small that Kant’s hope for a more peaceful world does not seem misplaced. A copy of the article is available here http://www.bama.ua.edu/~joneal/ISQ2006_data