If the publication decisions of journals are a function of the statistical significance of research findings, the published literature may suffer from “publication bias.” This paper describes a method for detecting publication bias. We point out that to achieve statistical significance, the effect size must be larger in small samples. If publications tend to be biased against statistically insignificant results, we should observe that the effect size diminishes as sample sizes increase. This proposition is tested and confirmed using the experimental literature on voter mobilization
Meta-analyses usually combine published studies, omitting those that for some reason have not been p...
The penultimate column lists principal references of the different methods and the final column indi...
Publication bias threatens the validity of meta-analytic results and leads to overestimation of the ...
Prior research finds that statistically significant results are overrepresented in scientific public...
We examine the APSR and the AJPS for the presence of publication bias due to reliance on the 0.05 si...
Publication bias is one threat to validity that researchers conducting meta-analysis studies confron...
This file contains all materials needed to replicate our analysis from the paper. We've also include...
The accuracy of published findings is compromised when researchers fail to report and adjust for mul...
Replication is often viewed as the demarcation between science and nonscience. However, contrary to ...
Units are randomly assigned, with equal probability, to receive a positive or negative fact on their...
How can the scientific literature provide unbiased conclusions if it represents a biased sample of a...
Some empirical results are more likely to be published than others. Such selective publication leads...
Publication bias refers to the tendency of research results to be selectively published depending on...
Background Publication bias is a form of scientific misconduct. It threatens the validity of researc...
Meta-analyses usually combine published studies, omitting those that for some reason have not been p...
Meta-analyses usually combine published studies, omitting those that for some reason have not been p...
The penultimate column lists principal references of the different methods and the final column indi...
Publication bias threatens the validity of meta-analytic results and leads to overestimation of the ...
Prior research finds that statistically significant results are overrepresented in scientific public...
We examine the APSR and the AJPS for the presence of publication bias due to reliance on the 0.05 si...
Publication bias is one threat to validity that researchers conducting meta-analysis studies confron...
This file contains all materials needed to replicate our analysis from the paper. We've also include...
The accuracy of published findings is compromised when researchers fail to report and adjust for mul...
Replication is often viewed as the demarcation between science and nonscience. However, contrary to ...
Units are randomly assigned, with equal probability, to receive a positive or negative fact on their...
How can the scientific literature provide unbiased conclusions if it represents a biased sample of a...
Some empirical results are more likely to be published than others. Such selective publication leads...
Publication bias refers to the tendency of research results to be selectively published depending on...
Background Publication bias is a form of scientific misconduct. It threatens the validity of researc...
Meta-analyses usually combine published studies, omitting those that for some reason have not been p...
Meta-analyses usually combine published studies, omitting those that for some reason have not been p...
The penultimate column lists principal references of the different methods and the final column indi...
Publication bias threatens the validity of meta-analytic results and leads to overestimation of the ...