The Effect of the Voting Rights Act on Enfranchisement: Evidence from North Carolina
- Fresh, Adriane
DOI Publisher
Harvard DataverseAbstract
Replication material for "The Effect of the Voting Rights Act on Enfranchisement: Evidence from North Carolina
Replication material for "The Effect of the Voting Rights Act on Enfranchisement: Evidence from North Carolina
We examine the link between the political participation of the young and fiscal policies in the Unit...
This paper provides a short summary of the history of voting rights in the United States. Additiona...
On March 7, 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States, over the partial dissent of Mr. Justice Bl...
The 2016 presidential election was the first such contest since 1964 to take place in the absence of...
The purpose of this article is to examine the Gingles v. Thornburg decision in light of the right to...
North Carolina offers its residents the opportunity to cast early in-person ballots prior to Electi...
After the Civil War, newly freed slaves hoped to gam the full benefits of American citizenship. In 1...
Despite wide scholarly interest in the Voting Rights Act, surprisingly little is known about how its...
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed with the intention of providing all Americans with the equa...
This year marks the fortieth anniversary of one of the most remarkable and consequential pieces of c...
Replication materials for “The Effect of Distributive Politics on Electoral Participation: Evidence ...
Section V of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) required covered jurisdictions to obtain “preclearance” bef...
Replication data and code for "Compulsory Voting Can Increase Political Inequality: Evidence From B...
Program year: 1994/1995Digitized from print original stored in HDRDue to incited interest in recent ...
This report addresses certain recent changes to North Carolina’s voting laws following the passage o...
We examine the link between the political participation of the young and fiscal policies in the Unit...
This paper provides a short summary of the history of voting rights in the United States. Additiona...
On March 7, 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States, over the partial dissent of Mr. Justice Bl...
The 2016 presidential election was the first such contest since 1964 to take place in the absence of...
The purpose of this article is to examine the Gingles v. Thornburg decision in light of the right to...
North Carolina offers its residents the opportunity to cast early in-person ballots prior to Electi...
After the Civil War, newly freed slaves hoped to gam the full benefits of American citizenship. In 1...
Despite wide scholarly interest in the Voting Rights Act, surprisingly little is known about how its...
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed with the intention of providing all Americans with the equa...
This year marks the fortieth anniversary of one of the most remarkable and consequential pieces of c...
Replication materials for “The Effect of Distributive Politics on Electoral Participation: Evidence ...
Section V of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) required covered jurisdictions to obtain “preclearance” bef...
Replication data and code for "Compulsory Voting Can Increase Political Inequality: Evidence From B...
Program year: 1994/1995Digitized from print original stored in HDRDue to incited interest in recent ...
This report addresses certain recent changes to North Carolina’s voting laws following the passage o...
We examine the link between the political participation of the young and fiscal policies in the Unit...
This paper provides a short summary of the history of voting rights in the United States. Additiona...
On March 7, 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States, over the partial dissent of Mr. Justice Bl...
Add to ORKG