From a government or law-enforcement perspective, one common model of privacy and security postulates that security and privacy are opposite ends of a single continuum. While this model has appealing properties, it is overly simplistic. The relationship between privacy and security is not a binary operation in which one can be traded for the other until a balance is found. One fallacy common in privacy and security discourse is that trade-offs are effective or even necessary. Consider the remarks of New York Police Department Commissioner Ray Kelly shortly after the Boston Marathon bombing, “I’m a major proponent of cameras. I think the privacy issue has really been taken off the table”
<p>Although most surveillance studies scholars assume privacy is antithetical to surveillance, criti...
This thesis concerns the ethics and political philosophy surrounding privacy. It investigates what p...
How should we think about our claims to privacy and their relationship to security? Must we suppose ...
From a government or law-enforcement perspective, one common model of privacy and security postulate...
rom a government or law-enforcement per-spective, one common model of privacy and security postulate...
Privacy and data protec-tion are among theprime problems of theinformation society.Many of us are co...
There is a common misconception that privacy and security are the same thing. The reality is that wh...
Considerable criticism has been levelled against thinking of privacy and security as being placed in...
If you\u27ve got nothing to hide, many people say, you shouldn\u27t worry about government surveil...
A recurring question in political philosophy is how to understand and analyse the trade-off between ...
A long-overdue discussion of security and privacy is taking place within the US and among its friend...
This paper considers the relationship between privacy and security and, in particular, the tradition...
Legal and policy debates about privacy revolve around conflicts between privacy and other goods. But...
Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-08In most privacy studies, privacy is assumed to b...
This volume examines the relationship between privacy, surveillance and security, and the alleged pr...
<p>Although most surveillance studies scholars assume privacy is antithetical to surveillance, criti...
This thesis concerns the ethics and political philosophy surrounding privacy. It investigates what p...
How should we think about our claims to privacy and their relationship to security? Must we suppose ...
From a government or law-enforcement perspective, one common model of privacy and security postulate...
rom a government or law-enforcement per-spective, one common model of privacy and security postulate...
Privacy and data protec-tion are among theprime problems of theinformation society.Many of us are co...
There is a common misconception that privacy and security are the same thing. The reality is that wh...
Considerable criticism has been levelled against thinking of privacy and security as being placed in...
If you\u27ve got nothing to hide, many people say, you shouldn\u27t worry about government surveil...
A recurring question in political philosophy is how to understand and analyse the trade-off between ...
A long-overdue discussion of security and privacy is taking place within the US and among its friend...
This paper considers the relationship between privacy and security and, in particular, the tradition...
Legal and policy debates about privacy revolve around conflicts between privacy and other goods. But...
Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-08In most privacy studies, privacy is assumed to b...
This volume examines the relationship between privacy, surveillance and security, and the alleged pr...
<p>Although most surveillance studies scholars assume privacy is antithetical to surveillance, criti...
This thesis concerns the ethics and political philosophy surrounding privacy. It investigates what p...
How should we think about our claims to privacy and their relationship to security? Must we suppose ...