For many years, the docket books kept by a number of the Hughes Court Justices have been held by the Office of the Curator of the Supreme Court. Yet the existence of these docket books was not widely known, and access to them was highly restricted. In April of 2014, however, the Court adopted new guidelines designed to increase access to the docket books for researchers. This article offers a report and analysis based on a review of all of the docket books that the Curator’s Office holds for the early Hughes Court, comprising the 1929-1933 Terms. Only one of the entries in these docket books has been examined and reported on before
Another \u27chapter\u27 for a Supreme Court history; a witness to change in Russia; a new direction ...
For this Michigan Law Review issue devoted to recently published books about law, I thought it would...
US. Supreme Court justices typically donate their working papers to archives upon their retirement, ...
For many years, the docket books kept by a number of the justices of the Hughes Court have been held...
For many years, the docket books kept by a number of the Hughes Court Justices have been held by the...
For many years, the docket books kept by certain of the Taft Court Justices have been held by the Of...
This article makes four principal claims. The first is that the justices of the Hughes Court often c...
The balance of this Article is devoted, after a fashion, to an exploration of the extent to which th...
For many years, the docket books kept by certain of the Taft Court Justices have been held by the Of...
Toward a fuller picture of how the Hughes Court transformed American constitutional law, thanks in p...
This lecture, delivered to the Supreme Court Historical Society, details the ways in which justices ...
Drawing on data from every Supreme Court Term between 1940 and 2017, this Article revisits, updates,...
The Supreme Court’s workload and its method for selecting cases have drawn increasing critical scrut...
With its 2019-20 Term disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Supreme Court released just 53 signed ...
For the most part, the Supreme Court\u27s decisions in 1932 and 1933 disappointed liberals. The two ...
Another \u27chapter\u27 for a Supreme Court history; a witness to change in Russia; a new direction ...
For this Michigan Law Review issue devoted to recently published books about law, I thought it would...
US. Supreme Court justices typically donate their working papers to archives upon their retirement, ...
For many years, the docket books kept by a number of the justices of the Hughes Court have been held...
For many years, the docket books kept by a number of the Hughes Court Justices have been held by the...
For many years, the docket books kept by certain of the Taft Court Justices have been held by the Of...
This article makes four principal claims. The first is that the justices of the Hughes Court often c...
The balance of this Article is devoted, after a fashion, to an exploration of the extent to which th...
For many years, the docket books kept by certain of the Taft Court Justices have been held by the Of...
Toward a fuller picture of how the Hughes Court transformed American constitutional law, thanks in p...
This lecture, delivered to the Supreme Court Historical Society, details the ways in which justices ...
Drawing on data from every Supreme Court Term between 1940 and 2017, this Article revisits, updates,...
The Supreme Court’s workload and its method for selecting cases have drawn increasing critical scrut...
With its 2019-20 Term disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Supreme Court released just 53 signed ...
For the most part, the Supreme Court\u27s decisions in 1932 and 1933 disappointed liberals. The two ...
Another \u27chapter\u27 for a Supreme Court history; a witness to change in Russia; a new direction ...
For this Michigan Law Review issue devoted to recently published books about law, I thought it would...
US. Supreme Court justices typically donate their working papers to archives upon their retirement, ...