Add to ORKGThe purpose of this article is not to enter into the still active debate on the propriety of electronic surveillance, nor is it to reexamine the policy arguments for and against court order electronic surveillance legislation. Debate needs to be brought down to specifics. Mr. Justice Holmes had a favorite admonition, [T]hink things instead of words. It is our purpose, therefore, to give to that debate a concrete proposal. Our proposal is a statute that is intended to serve as a starting point for meaningful dialogue; it is not meant to be the final word in the debate
This paper examines the history of electronic surveillance for national security purposes within the...
This Comment will first discuss the making of claims under section 3504(a)(1), and will show that th...
This article analyzes the extent that digital privacy acts are adequately protected by existing law....
After the September 11th attacks in 2001, Congress hastily passed the USA-Patriot Act which made sev...
This Article will examine some constitutional considerations raised by wiretapping and eavesdropping...
This article addresses the problems raised by the Title III minimization requirement with particular...
We are in the midst of a revolution in information collection and telecommunications. Computer netwo...
As communications surveillance techniques become increasingly important in government efforts to det...
Despite the critical examination to which many sections of Title III have been subjected, section 25...
The continuing controversy over the surveillance-related provisions of the USA Patriot Act highlight...
In his insightful article, The Dangers of Surveillance, 126 Harvard Law Review 1934 (2013), Neil R...
The ongoing dragnet communications surveillance programs raise multiple statutory and constitutional...
This Article explores those features of electronic surveillance that have made it challenging to reg...
In his insightful article The Dangers of Surveillance, 126 HARV. L. REV. 1934 (2013), Neil Richards ...
The term surveillance has taken on symbolic significance in our times. To those who shout law an...
This paper examines the history of electronic surveillance for national security purposes within the...
This Comment will first discuss the making of claims under section 3504(a)(1), and will show that th...
This article analyzes the extent that digital privacy acts are adequately protected by existing law....
After the September 11th attacks in 2001, Congress hastily passed the USA-Patriot Act which made sev...
This Article will examine some constitutional considerations raised by wiretapping and eavesdropping...
This article addresses the problems raised by the Title III minimization requirement with particular...
We are in the midst of a revolution in information collection and telecommunications. Computer netwo...
As communications surveillance techniques become increasingly important in government efforts to det...
Despite the critical examination to which many sections of Title III have been subjected, section 25...
The continuing controversy over the surveillance-related provisions of the USA Patriot Act highlight...
In his insightful article, The Dangers of Surveillance, 126 Harvard Law Review 1934 (2013), Neil R...
The ongoing dragnet communications surveillance programs raise multiple statutory and constitutional...
This Article explores those features of electronic surveillance that have made it challenging to reg...
In his insightful article The Dangers of Surveillance, 126 HARV. L. REV. 1934 (2013), Neil Richards ...
The term surveillance has taken on symbolic significance in our times. To those who shout law an...
This paper examines the history of electronic surveillance for national security purposes within the...
This Comment will first discuss the making of claims under section 3504(a)(1), and will show that th...
This article analyzes the extent that digital privacy acts are adequately protected by existing law....