The question whether stare decisis is compatible with originalism has occupied both originalists and their critics. In this Essay, I explore what light Justice Scalia’s approach to precedent casts on that question. I argue that while he did treat stare decisis as a pragmatic exception to originalism, that exception was not nearly so gaping as his “fainthearted” quip suggests. In fact, a survey of his opinions regarding precedent suggests new lines of inquiry for originalists grappling with the role of stare decisis in constitutional adjudication
This essay advances a formalist conception of constitutional stare decisis. The author argues that i...
In the debate over proper judicial interpretation of the law, the doctrine of Originalism has been s...
In this essay, based on the 2006 William Howard Taft lecture, the author critically evaluates Justic...
The question whether stare decisis is compatible with originalism has occupied both originalists and...
Part of Symposium: "Can Originalism be Reconciled with Precedent? A Symposium on Stare Decisis
For some time, a scholarly debate has raged over whether a commitment to the original meaning of the...
Despite endless literature urging that constitutional adjudication be severed from explorations into...
Much ink has already been spilled on the relationship of constitutional originalism to precedent (or...
This Essay considers the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s contributions to constitutional originalism a...
Part of Symposium: "Can Originalism be Reconciled with Precedent? A Symposium on Stare Decisis
This Article, a contribution to a symposium on constitutional foundations, maintains that an unappre...
Drawing on examples from Justice Antonin Scalia\u27s jurisprudence, this Essay uses the perspective ...
Additional contributor: Timothy Johnson (faculty mentor).Stare decisis, Latin for “to stand by,” is ...
The concern here is with the normative status of legislative precedents for an originalist Congress:...
This chapter examines the relationship among three normative questions about American constitutional...
This essay advances a formalist conception of constitutional stare decisis. The author argues that i...
In the debate over proper judicial interpretation of the law, the doctrine of Originalism has been s...
In this essay, based on the 2006 William Howard Taft lecture, the author critically evaluates Justic...
The question whether stare decisis is compatible with originalism has occupied both originalists and...
Part of Symposium: "Can Originalism be Reconciled with Precedent? A Symposium on Stare Decisis
For some time, a scholarly debate has raged over whether a commitment to the original meaning of the...
Despite endless literature urging that constitutional adjudication be severed from explorations into...
Much ink has already been spilled on the relationship of constitutional originalism to precedent (or...
This Essay considers the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s contributions to constitutional originalism a...
Part of Symposium: "Can Originalism be Reconciled with Precedent? A Symposium on Stare Decisis
This Article, a contribution to a symposium on constitutional foundations, maintains that an unappre...
Drawing on examples from Justice Antonin Scalia\u27s jurisprudence, this Essay uses the perspective ...
Additional contributor: Timothy Johnson (faculty mentor).Stare decisis, Latin for “to stand by,” is ...
The concern here is with the normative status of legislative precedents for an originalist Congress:...
This chapter examines the relationship among three normative questions about American constitutional...
This essay advances a formalist conception of constitutional stare decisis. The author argues that i...
In the debate over proper judicial interpretation of the law, the doctrine of Originalism has been s...
In this essay, based on the 2006 William Howard Taft lecture, the author critically evaluates Justic...