On December 1, 2015, a set of amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure took effect. Among the most significant and contentious of these changes is the Rules’ renewed focus on the concept of proportionality in the scope of discovery, added in an effort to curb perceived over-discovery. This Note argues that the new Rule 26(b) is not likely to substantially further the Committee’s professed goals. Specifically, this Note shows that, even if over-discovery is a rampant problem with proportionality as its solution—a contention that is not well supported by empirical evidence—the new Rule 26(b) does little that will effect change in federal civil litigation practice
This Article examines how the federal courts have balanced the burdens of supplementation of discove...
This Article responds to changes proposed by Congress and the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules to r...
First, we have a long way to go to educate judges about the benefit of active judicial management of...
On December 1, 2015, a set of amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure took effect. Among...
The proportionality amendment to the federal discovery rules, which went into effect on December 1...
After more than two decades of vigorous debate, the original Federal Rules of Civil Procedure became...
The 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were the latest maneuver by the conserva...
There has been widespread criticism of the abuse of discovery. \u27 That statement comes not from a ...
This Article focuses on pending amendments to Rule 26(b)(1), the scope-of-discovery provision in the...
30 p.This Comment begins by looking at the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure relating to discovery, ...
This Article analyzes the proportionality standard in discovery. Many believe the renewed emphasis o...
In April 2000 the United States Supreme Court promulgated a package of Proposed Amendments to the Fe...
The 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ambitiously sought to reduce pretrial de...
In this short essay, based on remarks delivered at the 2015 meeting of the AALS Section of Litigatio...
This issue includes a notice informing subscribers that Congress took no action on the package of am...
This Article examines how the federal courts have balanced the burdens of supplementation of discove...
This Article responds to changes proposed by Congress and the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules to r...
First, we have a long way to go to educate judges about the benefit of active judicial management of...
On December 1, 2015, a set of amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure took effect. Among...
The proportionality amendment to the federal discovery rules, which went into effect on December 1...
After more than two decades of vigorous debate, the original Federal Rules of Civil Procedure became...
The 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were the latest maneuver by the conserva...
There has been widespread criticism of the abuse of discovery. \u27 That statement comes not from a ...
This Article focuses on pending amendments to Rule 26(b)(1), the scope-of-discovery provision in the...
30 p.This Comment begins by looking at the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure relating to discovery, ...
This Article analyzes the proportionality standard in discovery. Many believe the renewed emphasis o...
In April 2000 the United States Supreme Court promulgated a package of Proposed Amendments to the Fe...
The 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ambitiously sought to reduce pretrial de...
In this short essay, based on remarks delivered at the 2015 meeting of the AALS Section of Litigatio...
This issue includes a notice informing subscribers that Congress took no action on the package of am...
This Article examines how the federal courts have balanced the burdens of supplementation of discove...
This Article responds to changes proposed by Congress and the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules to r...
First, we have a long way to go to educate judges about the benefit of active judicial management of...