This Note urges restoration of the proper balance of power between judges and juries regarding expert evidence. Our justice system has steadily moved away from letting juries decide important questions of fact and toward putting the decisionmaking power into the hands of judges. The recent developments in evidence law, requiring judges to act as the “gatekeepers” of expert evidence, present significant obstacles for plaintiffs attempting to get cases to a jury. This newer standard in expert evidence is a violation of the foundational precept in American jurisprudence that the people should be the sovereign, not the judge
It seems that the use of expert witnesses in common law courts has always been troublesome. In his T...
Jurors are laypersons with no specific expert knowledge, yet they are routinely placed in situations...
The rise in scientific evidence offered in American jury trials, along with court rulings thrusting ...
This Note urges restoration of the proper balance of power between judges and juries regarding exper...
The trial of Robert E. Chambers, Jr., for the murder of eighteen year old Jennifer Levin in Central ...
In this article, I argue that the new focus on the risks of spurious expertise compels attention t...
With regard to criminal cases, the focus of this Article, judges face significant challenges in ruli...
Although the early history of the jurata shows it to have been chosen from among those who were fami...
“Experts” appear in the modern American courtroom on the jury as well as in the witness box, posing ...
Our real world outside the ivory towers of academia and the courts grows more and more complex. The ...
It does not take long for even a casual observer of criminal and civil trials to make two observatio...
Read court decisions and commentaries from 100, or evenfive years ago, and you will find that expert...
This Article highlights lingering confusion in the caselaw as to the proper standard for the trial c...
Debate concerning the limits of judicial power over expert witnesses remains active and in its early...
The dispute over whether litigants may use experts to run unexamined hearsay into the trial record i...
It seems that the use of expert witnesses in common law courts has always been troublesome. In his T...
Jurors are laypersons with no specific expert knowledge, yet they are routinely placed in situations...
The rise in scientific evidence offered in American jury trials, along with court rulings thrusting ...
This Note urges restoration of the proper balance of power between judges and juries regarding exper...
The trial of Robert E. Chambers, Jr., for the murder of eighteen year old Jennifer Levin in Central ...
In this article, I argue that the new focus on the risks of spurious expertise compels attention t...
With regard to criminal cases, the focus of this Article, judges face significant challenges in ruli...
Although the early history of the jurata shows it to have been chosen from among those who were fami...
“Experts” appear in the modern American courtroom on the jury as well as in the witness box, posing ...
Our real world outside the ivory towers of academia and the courts grows more and more complex. The ...
It does not take long for even a casual observer of criminal and civil trials to make two observatio...
Read court decisions and commentaries from 100, or evenfive years ago, and you will find that expert...
This Article highlights lingering confusion in the caselaw as to the proper standard for the trial c...
Debate concerning the limits of judicial power over expert witnesses remains active and in its early...
The dispute over whether litigants may use experts to run unexamined hearsay into the trial record i...
It seems that the use of expert witnesses in common law courts has always been troublesome. In his T...
Jurors are laypersons with no specific expert knowledge, yet they are routinely placed in situations...
The rise in scientific evidence offered in American jury trials, along with court rulings thrusting ...