The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, in which California\u27s Discover Bank rule was struck by the Court under the Federal Arbitration Act, which was upheld by the California Supreme Court in the court case Discover Bank v. Superior Court. It provides information that the rule is a judge-made rule which depicts that class action waivers are unforceable in arbitration agreements if such agreements are mentioned in standard form consumer contracts
Arbitration clauses that prohibit class action lawsuits guard companies from class action litigation...
State consumer protection laws protect the public against unfair and deceptive trade practices. Plai...
In Shroyer, the Ninth Circuit laid a foundation for looking at consumer class action arbitration wai...
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, in which Califor...
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case AT\u26T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, in which Cali...
Since Congress first enacted the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in 1925, arbitration agreements have ...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
States have long relied on the doctrines of unconscionability and public policy to protect individua...
none1noIn the case AT&T Mobility v. Conception, U.S. Supreme Court held that California state contra...
This article focuses on small claims arbitration and examines the impact of AT&T Mobility on the leg...
Companies are increasingly drafting arbitration clauses worded to prevent consumers from bringing cl...
The longstanding debate over the benefits and detriments of mandatory arbitration in the consumer co...
In 1925, Congress enacted the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) as a means of quelling judicial hostilit...
Class actions and arbitrations have existed since the United States’ inception. Since the mid-twenti...
The American system of arbitration is constantly evolving. From the first formal arbitration tribun...
Arbitration clauses that prohibit class action lawsuits guard companies from class action litigation...
State consumer protection laws protect the public against unfair and deceptive trade practices. Plai...
In Shroyer, the Ninth Circuit laid a foundation for looking at consumer class action arbitration wai...
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, in which Califor...
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case AT\u26T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, in which Cali...
Since Congress first enacted the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in 1925, arbitration agreements have ...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
States have long relied on the doctrines of unconscionability and public policy to protect individua...
none1noIn the case AT&T Mobility v. Conception, U.S. Supreme Court held that California state contra...
This article focuses on small claims arbitration and examines the impact of AT&T Mobility on the leg...
Companies are increasingly drafting arbitration clauses worded to prevent consumers from bringing cl...
The longstanding debate over the benefits and detriments of mandatory arbitration in the consumer co...
In 1925, Congress enacted the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) as a means of quelling judicial hostilit...
Class actions and arbitrations have existed since the United States’ inception. Since the mid-twenti...
The American system of arbitration is constantly evolving. From the first formal arbitration tribun...
Arbitration clauses that prohibit class action lawsuits guard companies from class action litigation...
State consumer protection laws protect the public against unfair and deceptive trade practices. Plai...
In Shroyer, the Ninth Circuit laid a foundation for looking at consumer class action arbitration wai...