The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s approach in two cases Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Elec. Mfg. Co. and Van Dusen v. Barrack, regarding direct filing, aggregation litigation and choice of law in multidistrict litigation (MDL). It mentions that MDL is very high in federal courts specifically in places of mass wrongdoings or product liability. It explores that the traditional MDL framework is more appropriate with the policies underlying in these cases than the class action
On March 30, 2001, a somewhat surprising discussion took place among two judges, two plaintiffs\u27 ...
From the Deepwater Horizon disaster to the opioid crisis, multidistrict litigation—or simply MDL—has...
The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, which essentially federalizes all multi-state class-action ca...
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s approach in two cases Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Elec....
The article focuses on the procedural, substantive, and communal benefits of remanding multidistrict...
The article focuses on the need of remand in multidistrict litigation under the 1968 Multidistrict L...
The article focuses on various issues related to multidistrict litigation (MDL). Topics discussed in...
Nearly 40 percent of the civil cases currently pending in federal court—now over 130,000—are part of...
This Article explores the choice-of-law quandary and its important role in multidistrict litigation ...
The boundaries of federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) are blurring, as district courts seek innov...
The article focuses on two manifestations pertaining to collective litigation procedures including f...
Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) is a tool for managing complex litigation by transferring cases with ...
The occasion for this Essay is the fiftieth anniversary of the enactment of the multidistrict-litiga...
This Note proceeds in three parts. Part I provides a basic overview of the inherent power, with an e...
2018 marks fifty years since the passage of the Multidistrict Litigation Act. But instead of though...
On March 30, 2001, a somewhat surprising discussion took place among two judges, two plaintiffs\u27 ...
From the Deepwater Horizon disaster to the opioid crisis, multidistrict litigation—or simply MDL—has...
The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, which essentially federalizes all multi-state class-action ca...
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s approach in two cases Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Elec....
The article focuses on the procedural, substantive, and communal benefits of remanding multidistrict...
The article focuses on the need of remand in multidistrict litigation under the 1968 Multidistrict L...
The article focuses on various issues related to multidistrict litigation (MDL). Topics discussed in...
Nearly 40 percent of the civil cases currently pending in federal court—now over 130,000—are part of...
This Article explores the choice-of-law quandary and its important role in multidistrict litigation ...
The boundaries of federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) are blurring, as district courts seek innov...
The article focuses on two manifestations pertaining to collective litigation procedures including f...
Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) is a tool for managing complex litigation by transferring cases with ...
The occasion for this Essay is the fiftieth anniversary of the enactment of the multidistrict-litiga...
This Note proceeds in three parts. Part I provides a basic overview of the inherent power, with an e...
2018 marks fifty years since the passage of the Multidistrict Litigation Act. But instead of though...
On March 30, 2001, a somewhat surprising discussion took place among two judges, two plaintiffs\u27 ...
From the Deepwater Horizon disaster to the opioid crisis, multidistrict litigation—or simply MDL—has...
The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, which essentially federalizes all multi-state class-action ca...