Add to ORKGThe article presents information on the appropriate level of scrutiny that is required in reviewing the validity of constitutionality of restraints. It overviews the First Amendment jurisprudence with strict scrutiny and balancing test. It also explains the U.S. Supreme Court case Republican Party of Minnesota v. White. It suggests state to provide same protections to judicial candidates as that of other elected officials
This Article draws on my legislative and judicial background to focus both on the tendency of the co...
This article is a revised version of the author\u27s chapter in the forthcoming book, S. Halpern & C...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White shows how unrealistic five...
The article presents information on the appropriate level of scrutiny that is required in reviewing ...
The people want to elect judges. Notwithstanding a typical Washington lawyer’s view of the judiciary...
Most state court judges in the United States stand for election, whether it be one in which an oppos...
This Article is in two parts. The first part demonstrates that the ABA-sponsored proscription of cam...
Canons of ethics restrict judicial campaigning and prohibit sitting judges from engaging in politica...
This Article begins by reviewing the government employee line of cases, starting with United Public ...
This Article discusses judicial performance evaluations as a check on judicial independence. It cove...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s 2002 decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White was the...
This article proceeds in four stages. Part I examines the major rulings, relating to tort reform and...
The vast majority of judicial offices in the United States are subject to election. The votes of the...
Editor’s Note: There are about 8,500 state general-jurisdiction trial-court judges in the United Sta...
This Article looks at a rare part of the judicial role: those exceptional cases when the judge is ca...
This Article draws on my legislative and judicial background to focus both on the tendency of the co...
This article is a revised version of the author\u27s chapter in the forthcoming book, S. Halpern & C...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White shows how unrealistic five...
The article presents information on the appropriate level of scrutiny that is required in reviewing ...
The people want to elect judges. Notwithstanding a typical Washington lawyer’s view of the judiciary...
Most state court judges in the United States stand for election, whether it be one in which an oppos...
This Article is in two parts. The first part demonstrates that the ABA-sponsored proscription of cam...
Canons of ethics restrict judicial campaigning and prohibit sitting judges from engaging in politica...
This Article begins by reviewing the government employee line of cases, starting with United Public ...
This Article discusses judicial performance evaluations as a check on judicial independence. It cove...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s 2002 decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White was the...
This article proceeds in four stages. Part I examines the major rulings, relating to tort reform and...
The vast majority of judicial offices in the United States are subject to election. The votes of the...
Editor’s Note: There are about 8,500 state general-jurisdiction trial-court judges in the United Sta...
This Article looks at a rare part of the judicial role: those exceptional cases when the judge is ca...
This Article draws on my legislative and judicial background to focus both on the tendency of the co...
This article is a revised version of the author\u27s chapter in the forthcoming book, S. Halpern & C...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White shows how unrealistic five...