SAS58, one of the Expectation Gap auditing standards, changed the wording of the standard unqualified auditors report. The changes mandated by SAS58 do not reflect changes in the underlying auditing process or in the auditors responsibility for the audited financial statements. An experiment was conducted to determine whether these changes in the auditors report would affect jurors assessments of liability in an audit failure suit. No difference was found between liability assessments based on old and new forms of the report, suggesting that the changes mandated by SAS58 have no decision usefulness to report users
There is a concern that auditors and the public may have different beliefs about the auditors’ respo...
The audit function is an essential part of the regulatory structure which supports the integrity of ...
This study empirically examined Audit Expectation Gap: Perspectives of Auditors and Audited Account ...
One of the major concerns of the auditing profession is its increasing exposure to litigation, parti...
In 1988, the Auditing Standards Board released nine standards intended to narrow the previously iden...
The audit expectation gap is an interesting and widely researched phenomenon. This study seeks to ex...
The objectives of this report were, firstly, to study whether an expectation gap exists between the ...
This study examines whether the probability of a firm receiving a going concern modified report or a...
The present paper aims to study the expectation gap between the auditors and the users of financial ...
The audit expectations gap is of serious concern to the UK accounting profession with the Department...
The study aimed at identifying the factors that affect the expectation gap in the audit process from...
This paper examines the audit expectation gap with respect to financial statement users. Fifty five ...
This article examines audit reporting of accounting principles changes under SAS 58 and compares the...
The expectation gap, and its related effects on auditor legal liability, has been presumed to be cau...
The audit profession views its responsibility as that of ensuring that the financial statements give...
There is a concern that auditors and the public may have different beliefs about the auditors’ respo...
The audit function is an essential part of the regulatory structure which supports the integrity of ...
This study empirically examined Audit Expectation Gap: Perspectives of Auditors and Audited Account ...
One of the major concerns of the auditing profession is its increasing exposure to litigation, parti...
In 1988, the Auditing Standards Board released nine standards intended to narrow the previously iden...
The audit expectation gap is an interesting and widely researched phenomenon. This study seeks to ex...
The objectives of this report were, firstly, to study whether an expectation gap exists between the ...
This study examines whether the probability of a firm receiving a going concern modified report or a...
The present paper aims to study the expectation gap between the auditors and the users of financial ...
The audit expectations gap is of serious concern to the UK accounting profession with the Department...
The study aimed at identifying the factors that affect the expectation gap in the audit process from...
This paper examines the audit expectation gap with respect to financial statement users. Fifty five ...
This article examines audit reporting of accounting principles changes under SAS 58 and compares the...
The expectation gap, and its related effects on auditor legal liability, has been presumed to be cau...
The audit profession views its responsibility as that of ensuring that the financial statements give...
There is a concern that auditors and the public may have different beliefs about the auditors’ respo...
The audit function is an essential part of the regulatory structure which supports the integrity of ...
This study empirically examined Audit Expectation Gap: Perspectives of Auditors and Audited Account ...