In 1973, the Washington State Legislature enacted the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act. The stated purpose of the Act was to ensure safe working conditions for the working men and women of Washington. Seventeen years later, the Washington State Supreme Court held that general contractors are per se liable for the WISHA violations of their subcontractors. However, the Washington Department of Labor and Industries has adopted a policy of citing general contractors for subcontractor violations only in limited circumstances. This Comment first outlines the development of worker safety laws in Washington, then examines the effects of the Department’s policy at both the administrative and appellate level. Finally, this Comment argues t...
Employees were not entitled to increased benefits for injuries sustained in a construction accident ...
In Walston v. Boeing, the Supreme Court of Washington upheld a standard used to determine whether a ...
The purpose of this comment is threefold: (1) to reformulate the Washington rules in re peaceful pic...
In 1973, the Washington State Legislature enacted the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act. T...
This Article argues in support of the trend towards greater protection for workers through the deter...
The subject of this Comment is whether the actual control requirement in Hennig should also be emplo...
This Preface briefly describes WISHA, the problems of worker safety in Washington, and the role of L...
Occupational safety and health did not begin in 1973 in the State of Washington. Although the histor...
Under the nondelegable duty doctrine, a person or entity who has a duty to provide specified safegua...
Although this state has had a workmen\u27s compensation act since 1911, the employers generally have...
There are few instances in the law when a litigant can appeal to three successive tribunals upon fin...
The turn of the century witnessed the commencement of a great movement, in the United States, of soc...
Although the issue of regulatory devolution has received much scholarly scrutiny, rigorous empirical...
In Bravo v. Dolsen Cos., the Washington Court of Appeals held that the public policy provision of Wa...
Although the issueof regulatory devolutionhas receivedmuchscholarly scrutiny, rigorous empirical stu...
Employees were not entitled to increased benefits for injuries sustained in a construction accident ...
In Walston v. Boeing, the Supreme Court of Washington upheld a standard used to determine whether a ...
The purpose of this comment is threefold: (1) to reformulate the Washington rules in re peaceful pic...
In 1973, the Washington State Legislature enacted the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act. T...
This Article argues in support of the trend towards greater protection for workers through the deter...
The subject of this Comment is whether the actual control requirement in Hennig should also be emplo...
This Preface briefly describes WISHA, the problems of worker safety in Washington, and the role of L...
Occupational safety and health did not begin in 1973 in the State of Washington. Although the histor...
Under the nondelegable duty doctrine, a person or entity who has a duty to provide specified safegua...
Although this state has had a workmen\u27s compensation act since 1911, the employers generally have...
There are few instances in the law when a litigant can appeal to three successive tribunals upon fin...
The turn of the century witnessed the commencement of a great movement, in the United States, of soc...
Although the issue of regulatory devolution has received much scholarly scrutiny, rigorous empirical...
In Bravo v. Dolsen Cos., the Washington Court of Appeals held that the public policy provision of Wa...
Although the issueof regulatory devolutionhas receivedmuchscholarly scrutiny, rigorous empirical stu...
Employees were not entitled to increased benefits for injuries sustained in a construction accident ...
In Walston v. Boeing, the Supreme Court of Washington upheld a standard used to determine whether a ...
The purpose of this comment is threefold: (1) to reformulate the Washington rules in re peaceful pic...