The Access to Justice Technology Principles appended to this Rule state the governing values, principles, and standards which shall guide the use of technology in the Washington State justice system. These Principles apply to all courts of law, clerks, and court administrators and to all other persons and parts of the Washington justice system under the rule-making authority of this Court. These Principles shall be considered with other governing law and court rules by the courts of the State of Washington in deciding the appropriate use of technology in the administration of the courts and the cases that come before such courts
Have common law courts subtly and incrementally put themselves out of the substantial and traditiona...
New digital technologies, from AI-fired \u27legal tech\u27 tools to virtual proceedings, are transfor...
The information society has an intrinsic relationship with technology, which must be assimilated not...
This statement presumes a broad definition of access to justice, which includes the meaningful oppor...
To transform these values into reality, the Washington State Supreme Court Order gave the ATJ Board ...
The Access to Justice Technology Bill of Rights project, sponsored by the Access to Justice Board of...
This conference will focus on the fact that whether we like it or not the new information and commun...
The Washington State Access to Justice Technology Bill of Rights (ATJ-TBoR) process (Process), descr...
This brief report summarizes information obtained by a preliminary survey in the spring of 2003 of w...
Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution of the State of Washington guarantees, “Justice in all cas...
Reviews the history and approach to court rule making in Washington State. Critiques the Washington ...
This Article draws on my legislative and judicial background to focus both on the tendency of the co...
Asks how technology can help people to access justice across the legal industryBrings together leadi...
During these times of renewed interest in the defects in our judicial procedure, probably the most s...
Will digitization projects affect fundamental justice principles? Part I examines claims that techno...
Have common law courts subtly and incrementally put themselves out of the substantial and traditiona...
New digital technologies, from AI-fired \u27legal tech\u27 tools to virtual proceedings, are transfor...
The information society has an intrinsic relationship with technology, which must be assimilated not...
This statement presumes a broad definition of access to justice, which includes the meaningful oppor...
To transform these values into reality, the Washington State Supreme Court Order gave the ATJ Board ...
The Access to Justice Technology Bill of Rights project, sponsored by the Access to Justice Board of...
This conference will focus on the fact that whether we like it or not the new information and commun...
The Washington State Access to Justice Technology Bill of Rights (ATJ-TBoR) process (Process), descr...
This brief report summarizes information obtained by a preliminary survey in the spring of 2003 of w...
Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution of the State of Washington guarantees, “Justice in all cas...
Reviews the history and approach to court rule making in Washington State. Critiques the Washington ...
This Article draws on my legislative and judicial background to focus both on the tendency of the co...
Asks how technology can help people to access justice across the legal industryBrings together leadi...
During these times of renewed interest in the defects in our judicial procedure, probably the most s...
Will digitization projects affect fundamental justice principles? Part I examines claims that techno...
Have common law courts subtly and incrementally put themselves out of the substantial and traditiona...
New digital technologies, from AI-fired \u27legal tech\u27 tools to virtual proceedings, are transfor...
The information society has an intrinsic relationship with technology, which must be assimilated not...